Re: [PATCH v4] mm/memcg: try harder to decrease [memory,memsw].limit_in_bytes
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2018-01-10 22:31:28
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2018-01-10 22:31:28
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:43:17 +0300 Andrey Ryabinin [off-list ref] wrote:
mem_cgroup_resize_[memsw]_limit() tries to free only 32 (SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) pages on each iteration. This makes practically impossible to decrease limit of memory cgroup. Tasks could easily allocate back 32 pages, so we can't reduce memory usage, and once retry_count reaches zero we return -EBUSY. Easy to reproduce the problem by running the following commands: mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test echo $$ >> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/tasks cat big_file > /dev/null & sleep 1 && echo $((100*1024*1024)) > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.limit_in_bytes -bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy Instead of relying on retry_count, keep retrying the reclaim until the desired limit is reached or fail if the reclaim doesn't make any progress or a signal is pending.
Is there any situation under which that mem_cgroup_resize_limit() can get stuck semi-indefinitely in a livelockish state? It isn't very obvious that we're protected from this, so perhaps it would help to have a comment which describes how loop termination is assured?