Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 4 authors, 2016-08-11

Re: [RFC][PATCH] cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem - affects scalability and OOM

From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-08-09 18:09:46
Also in: linux-mm

On 08/09, Balbir Singh wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1406,7 +1406,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 	p->real_start_time = ktime_get_boot_ns();
 	p->io_context = NULL;
 	p->audit_context = NULL;
-	threadgroup_change_begin(current);
 	cgroup_fork(p);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 	p->mempolicy = mpol_dup(p->mempolicy);
@@ -1558,6 +1557,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->thread_group);
 	p->task_works = NULL;
 
+	threadgroup_change_begin(current);
 	/*
 	 * Ensure that the cgroup subsystem policies allow the new process to be
 	 * forked. It should be noted the the new process's css_set can be changed
@@ -1658,6 +1658,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 bad_fork_cancel_cgroup:
 	cgroup_cancel_fork(p);
 bad_fork_free_pid:
+	threadgroup_change_end(current);
 	if (pid != &init_struct_pid)
 		free_pid(pid);
 bad_fork_cleanup_thread:
@@ -1690,7 +1691,6 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
 	mpol_put(p->mempolicy);
 bad_fork_cleanup_threadgroup_lock:
 #endif
-	threadgroup_change_end(current);
 	delayacct_tsk_free(p);
 bad_fork_cleanup_count:
 	atomic_dec(&p->cred->user->processes);
I can't really review this change... but it looks good to me.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help