Re: [RFC][PATCH] cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem - affects scalability and OOM
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-08-09 18:09:46
Also in:
linux-mm
On 08/09, Balbir Singh wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c@@ -1406,7 +1406,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, p->real_start_time = ktime_get_boot_ns(); p->io_context = NULL; p->audit_context = NULL; - threadgroup_change_begin(current); cgroup_fork(p); #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA p->mempolicy = mpol_dup(p->mempolicy);@@ -1558,6 +1557,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->thread_group); p->task_works = NULL; + threadgroup_change_begin(current); /* * Ensure that the cgroup subsystem policies allow the new process to be * forked. It should be noted the the new process's css_set can be changed@@ -1658,6 +1658,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, bad_fork_cancel_cgroup: cgroup_cancel_fork(p); bad_fork_free_pid: + threadgroup_change_end(current); if (pid != &init_struct_pid) free_pid(pid); bad_fork_cleanup_thread:@@ -1690,7 +1691,6 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_policy: mpol_put(p->mempolicy); bad_fork_cleanup_threadgroup_lock: #endif - threadgroup_change_end(current); delayacct_tsk_free(p); bad_fork_cleanup_count: atomic_dec(&p->cred->user->processes);
I can't really review this change... but it looks good to me. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>