Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches instead of pinning super_block
From: Jan Kara <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-29 21:21:00
Also in:
lkml
From: Jan Kara <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-29 21:21:00
Also in:
lkml
On Mon 29-02-16 16:08:00, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:06:15PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:quoted
quoted
Hmmm? The flushing is done after shrink_dcache_for_umount() and sync_filesystems(). Aren't inodes supposed to stay clean after that?s/shrink_dcache_for_umount/fsnotify_unmount_inodes/ - sorry.Is that allowed to dirty indoes and initiate writebacks again, after sync_filesystems() is done? That sounds weird but it's trivial to move cgroup_writeback_umount() below that if so.
Hardly, but generally it is true that filesystem may still dirty something (e.g. from outstanding workqueue work, but most likely some special "system inodes" may still become dirty) until ->put_super() is finished. Anyway, to make this foolproof, I'd just avoid queueing any new switching work after S_ACTIVE is cleared on the superblock and flush the workqueue just before evict_inodes() call. Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SUSE Labs, CR