Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Android style loosening of cgroup attach permissions
From: John Stultz <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-05 21:33:06
Also in:
lkml
From: John Stultz <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-05 21:33:06
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Johannes Weiner [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:11:17AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Tejun Heo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
memcg usage came up a while ago and there wasn't anything major which can't be achieved (usually better) by following more standard cgroup usage - changing knobs rather than moving tasks around.Do you have a pointer to that discussion or maybe even just a sense of who was involved so I can trawl the list and better understand it?I wrote a lengthy explanation of why moving tasks between cgroups is problematic from a memcg view: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/19/358
And many thanks for the discussion pointer here! Its very enlightening! thanks -john