Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2014-09-24

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should beatomic flags

From: Tejun Heo <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-23 13:13:25
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:55:48PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Zefan Li wrote:
quoted
Tetsuo reported a hard-to-reproduce kernel crash on RHEL6, which happend
s/happend/happened/
quoted
@@ -1972,6 +1973,14 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
 TASK_PFA_TEST(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
 TASK_PFA_SET(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
 
+TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
+TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
+TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
+
+TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
+TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
+TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
+
I wonder how adding 3 macro lines differs from 3 inlined functions.
Personally, from LXR (source code browser) point of view, inlined functions
are more friendly than macros. Also, I wonder about the cost of extracting
macros in a file which is likely included by every file but referenced
by few files. Speak of SPREAD_PAGE and SPREAD_SLAB, they should be defined
as inlined functions in include/linux/cpuset.h rather than as macros in
include/linux/sched.h ?
I think sched.h is fine along w/ inlines for other flags but yeah we
might be better off just open-coding them.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help