Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access... | cgroups

[patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-10-31
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-10-31
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-13
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-13
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-14
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-14
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-14
[patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-14
[patch 2/2] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-14
Re: [patch 2/2] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-11-18
Re: [patch 2/2] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-19
Re: [patch 2/2] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-11-19
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-11-18
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-11-18
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-19
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-18
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-11-18
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-19
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-22
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-27
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-27
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-27
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-27
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-28
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-28
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-11-28
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-28
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-02
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-12-02
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-03
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-12-03
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-03
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-12-03
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-03
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-12-04
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-04
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-05
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-09
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-09
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-12-09
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-12-09
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-11
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-11
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-11
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-12
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-12
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-12
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-12
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-13
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-17
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-17
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-18
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2013-12-19
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2013-12-19
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2014-01-08
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-08
[PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-09
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-09
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-10
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-10
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-15
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-15
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-16
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-21
Re: [PATCH] memcg: Do not hang on OOM when killed by userspace OOM access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-21
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-09
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2014-01-09
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-12
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-15
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-15
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-16
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-21
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Greg Kroah-Hartmann <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2014-01-21
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-21
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Michal Hocko <hidden> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2014-01-10
Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-12
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> · 2013-11-18
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom · One Thousand Gnomes <hidden> · 2013-11-18

Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves

From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-16 09:32:26
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Wed 15-01-14 13:23:10, David Rientjes wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Michal Hocko wrote:

[...]

quoted

Which depends on yours only to revert your part. I plan to repost it but
that still doesn't mean it will get merged because Johannes still has
some argumnets against. I would like to start the discussion again
because now we are so deep in circles that it is hard to come up with a
reasonable outcome. It is still hard to e.g. agree on an actual fix
for a real problem https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/12/129.

This is concerning because it's merged in -mm without being tested by Eric 
and is marked for stable while violating the stable kernel rules criteria.

Are you questioning the patch fixes the described issue?

Please note that the exit_robust_list and PF_EXITING as a culprit has
been identified by Eric. Of course I would prefer if it was tested by
anybody who can reproduce it.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help