cgroups archive · October 2013

174 messages across 68 threads, ordered by last activity .

• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-31 23:27 · 0 replies this month · Steven Rostedt <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-31 21:46 · 0 replies this month · Hugh Dickins <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-31 17:06 · 0 replies this month · Steven Rostedt <hidden>
• STALE4573d [patch] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom
  2013-10-31 05:52 · 1 reply this month · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
• STALE4655d [PATCH 0/3] a few cleanups about kmem code
  2013-10-31 02:40 · 9 replies this month · Qiang Huang <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-31 02:09 · 0 replies this month · Hugh Dickins <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-30 08:14 · 0 replies this month · Li Zefan <hidden>
• STALE4647d [PATCH v2 0/3] fix unsigned pcp adjustments
  2013-10-29 14:31 · 5 replies this month · Greg Thelen <hidden>
• STALE4494d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) [PATCH] blk-throttle: simplify logic by token bucket algorithm
  2013-10-28 05:08 · 23 replies this month · Hong Zhiguo <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu_sub() adjustment
  2013-10-27 17:12 · 0 replies this month · Greg Thelen <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu_sub() adjustment
  2013-10-27 16:13 · 0 replies this month · Greg Thelen <hidden>
• STALE4659d [PATCH 3/3] cgroups: remove calls to simple_kstrtoll
  2013-10-27 15:12 · 2 replies this month · Daniel Walker <hidden>
• STALE4659d [PATCH 0/3] fix unsigned pcp adjustments
  2013-10-27 13:00 · 8 replies this month · Greg Thelen <hidden>
• STALE4654d [PATCH v11 00/15] kmemcg shrinkers
  2013-10-24 12:08 · 15 replies this month · Vladimir Davydov <hidden>
• STALE4664d Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-22 07:45 · 3 replies this month · Daniel Borkmann <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-22 07:36 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Wagner <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 0/6] ipv4: tcp_memcontrol and userns sysctls
  2013-10-21 22:44 · 0 replies this month · David Miller <hidden>
• STALE4665d Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-21 15:15 · 1 reply this month · Daniel Borkmann <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [GIT PULL] cgroup fixes for v3.12-rc6
  2013-10-21 10:49 · 0 replies this month · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 6/6] ipv4: Allow unprivileged users to use per net sysctls
  2013-10-19 23:27 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 5/6] ipv4: Use math to point per net sysctls into the appropriate struct net.
  2013-10-19 23:27 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 4/6] tcp_memcontrol: Kill struct tcp_memcontrol
  2013-10-19 23:26 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 3/6] tcp_memcontrol: Remove the per netns control.
  2013-10-19 23:25 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 2/6] tcp_memcontrol: Remove setting cgroup settings via sysctl
  2013-10-19 23:24 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/6] tcp_memcontrol: Remove tcp_max_memory
  2013-10-19 23:24 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 0/6] ipv4: tcp_memcontrol and userns sysctls
  2013-10-19 23:23 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-18 23:21 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-18 13:28 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Borkmann <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-18 09:57 · 0 replies this month · Markus Blank-Burian <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-18 09:34 · 0 replies this month · Markus Blank-Burian <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: simplify logic by token bucket algorithm
  2013-10-16 16:22 · 0 replies this month · Hong zhi guo <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH] blk-throttle: use READ/WRITE directly
  2013-10-16 13:59 · 0 replies this month · Vivek Goyal <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] blk-throttle: use READ/WRITE directly
  2013-10-16 10:56 · 0 replies this month · Hong Zhiguo <hidden>
• STALE4671d [PATCH v2 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks
  2013-10-15 15:36 · 15 replies this month · Li Zefan <hidden>
• STALE4671d Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-15 13:34 · 7 replies this month · Oleg Nesterov <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies A problem of blkio in throttlling I/O weight across multiple hosts.
  2013-10-15 07:20 · 0 replies this month · Wangshen (Peter) <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-15 03:47 · 0 replies this month · Li Zefan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-15 03:15 · 0 replies this month · Li Zefan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-14 08:06 · 0 replies this month · Markus Blank-Burian <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] blk-throttle: simplify logic by token bucket algorithm
  2013-10-13 12:59 · 0 replies this month · Hong zhi guo <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-12 06:00 · 0 replies this month · Li Zefan <hidden>
• STALE4609d [patch 1/2] mm: memcg: handle non-error OOM situations more gracefully
  2013-10-11 20:52 · 2 replies this month · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-11 16:05 · 0 replies this month · Markus Blank-Burian <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-11 13:06 · 0 replies this month · Li Zefan <hidden>
• STALE4675d [patch 0/7] improve memcg oom killer robustness v2
  2013-10-10 22:59 · 5 replies this month · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-10 21:55 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Borkmann <hidden>
• STALE4675d strange oom behaviour on 3.10
  2013-10-10 20:48 · 3 replies this month · William Dauchy <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-10 11:11 · 0 replies this month · Oleg Nesterov <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-10 08:50 · 0 replies this month · Markus Blank-Burian <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Possible regression with cgroups in 3.11
  2013-10-10 08:49 · 0 replies this month · Markus Blank-Burian <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-10 04:22 · 0 replies this month · anjana vk <hidden>
• STALE4676d Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-09 19:12 · 1 reply this month · Tejun Heo <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-09 13:30 · 0 replies this month · Oleg Nesterov <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-09 05:35 · 0 replies this month · Li Zefan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: cls: remove unnecessary task_cls_classid
  2013-10-08 20:52 · 0 replies this month · David Miller <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: netprio: remove unnecessary task_netprioidx
  2013-10-08 20:52 · 0 replies this month · David Miller <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-08 14:58 · 0 replies this month · Oleg Nesterov <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: cls: remove unnecessary task_cls_classid
  2013-10-08 13:17 · 0 replies this month · Neil Horman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: netprio: remove unnecessary task_netprioidx
  2013-10-08 13:15 · 0 replies this month · Neil Horman <hidden>
• STALE4678d [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-08 08:05 · 4 replies this month · Daniel Borkmann <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: cls: remove unnecessary task_cls_classid
  2013-10-08 03:05 · 0 replies this month · Gao feng <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: netprio: remove unnecessary task_netprioidx
  2013-10-08 03:05 · 0 replies this month · Gao feng <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-07 18:45 · 0 replies this month · Tejun Heo <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control group matching
  2013-10-07 09:42 · 0 replies this month · Gao feng <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH iptables] iptables: add libxt_cgroup frontend
  2013-10-04 18:21 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Borkmann <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-04 13:02 · 0 replies this month · Oleg Nesterov <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies cgroup attach task - slogging cpu
  2013-10-04 05:25 · 0 replies this month · anjana vk <hidden>
• STALE4684d [patch for-3.12] mm, memcg: protect mem_cgroup_read_events for cpu hotplug
  2013-10-02 03:08 · 3 replies this month · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>