Re: [PATCH V5] memcg, oom: provide more precise dump info while memcg oom happening
From: Sha Zhengju <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-21 03:55:13
Also in:
linux-mm
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:51:01 +0800 Sha Zhengju [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+ pr_info("Memory cgroup stats");Well if we're going to do that, we may as well finish the job: From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Subject: mm/memcontrol.c: convert printk(KERN_FOO) to pr_foo() Cc: Sha Zhengju <redacted> Cc: Michal Hocko <redacted> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted> Cc: David Rientjes <redacted> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrolc-convert-printkkern_foo-to-pr_foo mm/memcontrol.c--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrolc-convert-printkkern_foo-to-pr_foo +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me } rcu_read_unlock(); - printk(KERN_INFO "Task in %s killed", memcg_name); + pr_info("Task in %s killed", memcg_name); rcu_read_lock(); ret = cgroup_path(mem_cgrp, memcg_name, PATH_MAX);@@ -1587,19 +1587,18 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me /* * Continues from above, so we don't need an KERN_ level */ - printk(KERN_CONT " as a result of limit of %s\n", memcg_name); + pr_cont(" as a result of limit of %s\n", memcg_name); done: - printk(KERN_INFO "memory: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, failcnt %llu\n", + pr_info("memory: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, failcnt %llu\n", res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) >> 10, res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT) >> 10, res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_FAILCNT)); - printk(KERN_INFO "memory+swap: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, " - "failcnt %llu\n", + pr_info("memory+swap: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, failcnt %llu\n", res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE) >> 10, res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT) >> 10, res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_FAILCNT)); - printk(KERN_INFO "kmem: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, failcnt %llu\n", + pr_info("kmem: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, failcnt %llu\n", res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_USAGE) >> 10, res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_LIMIT) >> 10, res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_FAILCNT));@@ -4424,8 +4423,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct pa pc = lookup_page_cgroup_used(page); if (pc) { - printk(KERN_ALERT "pc:%p pc->flags:%lx pc->mem_cgroup:%p\n", - pc, pc->flags, pc->mem_cgroup); + pr_alert("pc:%p pc->flags:%lx pc->mem_cgroup:%p\n", + pc, pc->flags, pc->mem_cgroup); } } #endif_
Thanks Andrew! : ) Acked-by: Sha Zhengju <redacted>