On 10/23/2012 09:25 PM, JoonSoo Kim wrote:

Hi, Glauber.

2012/10/19 Glauber Costa [off-list ref]:

quoted

For the kmem slab controller, we need to record some extra
information in the kmem_cache structure.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <redacted>
CC: Christoph Lameter <redacted>
CC: Pekka Enberg <redacted>
CC: Michal Hocko <redacted>
CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <redacted>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/slab.h     | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/slab_def.h |  3 +++
 include/linux/slub_def.h |  3 +++
 mm/slab.h                | 13 +++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index 0dd2dfa..e4ea48a 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h

@@ -177,6 +177,31 @@ unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *);
 #define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
 #endif

+#include <linux/workqueue.h>

Why workqueue.h is includede at this time?
It may be future use, so is it better to add it later?
Adding it at proper time makes git blame works better.

It is for later, I missed this.

Thanks for spotting.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>