Re: [PATCH v4 08/14] res_counter: return amount of charges after res_counter_uncharge
From: Glauber Costa <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-10 09:03:56
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 10/09/2012 07:35 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 09-10-12 19:14:57, Glauber Costa wrote:quoted
On 10/09/2012 07:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
As I have already mentioned in my previous feedback this is cetainly not atomic as you the lock protects only one group in the hierarchy. How is the return value from this function supposed to be used?So, I tried to make that clearer in the updated changelog. Only the value of the base memcg (the one passed to the function) is returned, and it is atomic, in the sense that it has the same semantics as the atomic variables: If 2 threads uncharge 4k each from a 8 k counter, a subsequent read can return 0 for both. The return value here will guarantee that only one sees the drop to 0. This is used in the patch "kmem_accounting lifecycle management" to be sure that only one process will call mem_cgroup_put() in the memcg structure.Yes, you are using res_counter_uncharge and its semantic makes sense. I was refering to res_counter_uncharge_until (you removed that context from my reply) because that one can race resulting that nobody sees 0 even though that parents get down to 0 as a result: A | B / \ C(x) D(y) D and C uncharge everything. CPU0 CPU1 ret += uncharge(D) [0] ret += uncharge(C) [0] ret += uncharge(B) [x-from C] ret += uncharge(B) [0] ret += uncharge(A) [y-from D] ret += uncharge(A) [0] ret == x ret == y
Sorry Michal, I didn't realize you were talking about
res_counter_uncharge_until.
I don't really need res_counter_uncharge_until to return anything, so I
can just remove that if you prefer, keeping just the main
res_counter_uncharge.
However, I still can't make sense of your concern.
The return value will return the value of the counter passed as a
parameter to the function:
r = res_counter_uncharge_locked(c, val);
if (c == counter)
ret = r;
So when you call res_counter_uncharge_until(D, whatever, x), you will
see zero here as a result, and when you call
res_counter_uncharge_until(D, whatever, y) you will see 0 here as well.
A doesn't get involved with that.