Hi Sedat,

On 14.09.2012 16:43, Sedat Dilek wrote:

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Daniel Wagner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Daniel Wagner <redacted>

commit 1f66c0a8833c3974ab6b35edcf4f8585b2f94592
Author: Daniel Wagner [off-list ref]
Date:   Wed Sep 12 16:12:01 2012 +0200

     cgroup: net_cls: Move sock_update_classid() declaration to cls_cgroup.h

Claimed that there was only net/socket.c depending on
sock_update_class(). That is not true drivers/net/tun.c needs to
include the cls_cgroup.h header too.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <redacted>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <redacted>
Cc: Gao feng <redacted>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <redacted>
Cc: John Fastabend <redacted>
Cc: Li Zefan <redacted>
Cc: Neil Horman <redacted>
Cc: Rick Jones <redacted>
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky <redacted>
Cc: Tejun Heo <redacted>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
---

This version is on top of the latest cgroup for-3.7 branch.

Thanks for the quick fix.

No problem. I am still ashamed not finding it myself.

Please honour Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref].

Sure, will do next time.

If this is the fix for the breakage in today's Linux-Next
(next-20120914), please add a "-next" to the subject next time.

Correct, this one is for linux-next but I got the impression that cgroup 
for-3.7 branch was ignored because of this. Therefore I have send two 
versions. Hmm, I'll need to check the results of todays next tree.

thanks,
daniel