Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-08-15

Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] kmem accounting basic infrastructure

From: Greg Thelen <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-15 15:26:43
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Wed, Aug 15 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
quoted
That is not what the kernel does, in general. We assume that if he wants
that memory and we can serve it, we should. Also, not all kernel memory
is unreclaimable. We can shrink the slabs, for instance. Ying Han
claims she has patches for that already...
Are those patches somewhere around?
You can already shrink the reclaimable slabs (dentries / inodes) via
calls to the subsystem specific shrinkers. Did Ying Han do anything to
go beyond that?
cc: Ying

The Google shrinker patches enhance prune_dcache_sb() to limit dentry
pressure to a specific memcg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help