Re: [PATCH 4/7] Use vfs __set_page_dirty interface instead of doing it inside filesystem
From: Sage Weil <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-02 14:49:33
Also in:
ceph-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-07-04 · Re: [PATCH 4/7] Use vfs __set_page_dirty interface instead of doing it inside filesystem · Michal Hocko <hidden>
- 2012-06-28 · [PATCH 4/7] Use vfs __set_page_dirty interface instead of doing it inside filesystem · Sha Zhengju <hidden>
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Sha Zhengju wrote:
On 06/29/2012 01:21 PM, Sage Weil wrote:quoted
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Sha Zhengju wrote:quoted
From: Sha Zhengju<redacted> Following we will treat SetPageDirty and dirty page accounting as an integrated operation. Filesystems had better use vfs interface directly to avoid those details. Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju<redacted> --- fs/buffer.c | 2 +- fs/ceph/addr.c | 20 ++------------------ include/linux/buffer_head.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c index e8d96b8..55522dd 100644 --- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_dirty_inode); * If warn is true, then emit a warning if the page is not uptodate andhas * not been truncated. */ -static int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page, +int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping, int warn) { if (unlikely(!mapping))This also needs an EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty) to allow ceph to continue to build as a module. With that fixed, the ceph bits are a welcome cleanup! Acked-by: Sage Weil<redacted>Further, I check the path again and may it be reworked as follows to avoid undo? __set_page_dirty(); __set_page_dirty(); ceph operations; ==> if (page->mapping) if (page->mapping) ceph operations; ; else undo = 1; if (undo) xxx;
Yep. Taking another look at the original code, though, I'm worried that one reason the __set_page_dirty() actions were spread out the way they are is because we wanted to ensure that the ceph operations were always performed when PagePrivate was set. It looks like invalidatepage won't get called if private isn't set, and presumably it handles the truncate race with __set_page_dirty() properly (right?). What about writeback? Do we need to worry about writepage[s] getting called with a NULL page->private? Thanks! sage
Thanks, Shaquoted
quoted
diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c index 8b67304..d028fbe 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include<linux/mm.h> #include<linux/pagemap.h> #include<linux/writeback.h> /* generic_writepages */ +#include<linux/buffer_head.h> #include<linux/slab.h> #include<linux/pagevec.h> #include<linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>@@ -73,14 +74,8 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) int undo = 0; struct ceph_snap_context *snapc; - if (unlikely(!mapping)) - return !TestSetPageDirty(page); - - if (TestSetPageDirty(page)) { - dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n", - mapping->host, page, page->index); + if (!__set_page_dirty(page, mapping, 1)) return 0; - } inode = mapping->host; ci = ceph_inode(inode);@@ -107,14 +102,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) snapc, snapc->seq, snapc->num_snaps); spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock); - /* now adjust page */ - spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); if (page->mapping) { /* Race with truncate? */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageUptodate(page)); - account_page_dirtied(page, page->mapping); - radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, - page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY); - /* * Reference snap context in page->private. Also set * PagePrivate so that we get invalidatepage callback.@@ -126,14 +114,10 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) undo = 1; } - spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - if (undo) /* whoops, we failed to dirty the page */ ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(ci, 1, snapc); - __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES); - BUG_ON(!PageDirty(page)); return 1; }diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h index 458f497..0a331a8 100644 --- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h +++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h@@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ static inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh) } extern int __set_page_dirty_buffers(struct page *page); +extern int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page, + struct address_space *mapping, int warn); #else /* CONFIG_BLOCK */-- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html