Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2012-07-05

Re: [PATCH 4/7] Use vfs __set_page_dirty interface instead of doing it inside filesystem

From: Sage Weil <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-02 14:49:33
Also in: ceph-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Sha Zhengju wrote:
On 06/29/2012 01:21 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Sha Zhengju wrote:
quoted
From: Sha Zhengju<redacted>

Following we will treat SetPageDirty and dirty page accounting as an
integrated
operation. Filesystems had better use vfs interface directly to avoid
those details.

Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju<redacted>
---
  fs/buffer.c                 |    2 +-
  fs/ceph/addr.c              |   20 ++------------------
  include/linux/buffer_head.h |    2 ++
  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index e8d96b8..55522dd 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_dirty_inode);
   * If warn is true, then emit a warning if the page is not uptodate and
has
   * not been truncated.
   */
-static int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
+int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
  		struct address_space *mapping, int warn)
  {
  	if (unlikely(!mapping))
This also needs an EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty) to allow ceph to
continue to build as a module.

With that fixed, the ceph bits are a welcome cleanup!

Acked-by: Sage Weil<redacted>
Further, I check the path again and may it be reworked as follows to avoid
undo?

__set_page_dirty();
__set_page_dirty();
ceph operations;                ==>                    if (page->mapping)
if (page->mapping)                                            ceph operations;
    ;
else
    undo = 1;
if (undo)
    xxx;
Yep.  Taking another look at the original code, though, I'm worried that 
one reason the __set_page_dirty() actions were spread out the way they are 
is because we wanted to ensure that the ceph operations were always 
performed when PagePrivate was set.

It looks like invalidatepage won't get called if private isn't set, and 
presumably it handles the truncate race with __set_page_dirty() properly 
(right?).  What about writeback?  Do we need to worry about writepage[s] 
getting called with a NULL page->private?

Thanks!
sage




Thanks,
Sha
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index 8b67304..d028fbe 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  #include<linux/mm.h>
  #include<linux/pagemap.h>
  #include<linux/writeback.h>	/* generic_writepages */
+#include<linux/buffer_head.h>
  #include<linux/slab.h>
  #include<linux/pagevec.h>
  #include<linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
@@ -73,14 +74,8 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
  	int undo = 0;
  	struct ceph_snap_context *snapc;

-	if (unlikely(!mapping))
-		return !TestSetPageDirty(page);
-
-	if (TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
-		dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n",
-		     mapping->host, page, page->index);
+	if (!__set_page_dirty(page, mapping, 1))
  		return 0;
-	}

  	inode = mapping->host;
  	ci = ceph_inode(inode);
@@ -107,14 +102,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
  	     snapc, snapc->seq, snapc->num_snaps);
  	spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);

-	/* now adjust page */
-	spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
  	if (page->mapping) {	/* Race with truncate? */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageUptodate(page));
-		account_page_dirtied(page, page->mapping);
-		radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
-				page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
-
  		/*
  		 * Reference snap context in page->private.  Also set
  		 * PagePrivate so that we get invalidatepage callback.
@@ -126,14 +114,10 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
  		undo = 1;
  	}

-	spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
-
  	if (undo)
  		/* whoops, we failed to dirty the page */
  		ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(ci, 1, snapc);

-	__mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
-
  	BUG_ON(!PageDirty(page));
  	return 1;
  }
diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
index 458f497..0a331a8 100644
--- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
+++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ static inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
  }

  extern int __set_page_dirty_buffers(struct page *page);
+extern int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
+		struct address_space *mapping, int warn);

  #else /* CONFIG_BLOCK */
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help