Re: [PATCH] slab+slob: dup name string

On Tue, 22 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:

quoted

I think that's precisely David's point: that we might want to destroy them
eventually.

Cannot imagine why.

We can't predict how slab will be extended in the future and this affects 
anything created before g_cpucache_cpu <= EARLY.  This would introduce the 
first problem with destroying such caches and is unnecessary if a 
workaround exists.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>