Re: [PATCH 04/10] memcg: Introduce __GFP_NOACCOUNT.
From: Suleiman Souhlal <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-04 00:10:36
Also in:
linux-mm
From: Suleiman Souhlal <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-04 00:10:36
Also in:
linux-mm
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Glauber Costa [off-list ref] wrote:
On 03/03/2012 01:38 PM, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:quoted
Another possible example might be the skb data, which are just kmalloc and are already accounted by your TCP accounting changes, so we might not want to account them a second time.How so? struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask, int fclone, int node) { [ ... ] cache = fclone ? skbuff_fclone_cache : skbuff_head_cache; /* Get the HEAD */ skb = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cache, gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DMA, node);
Just a few lines below:
data = kmalloc_node_track_caller(size, gfp_mask, node);
-- Suleiman
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>