Re: [PATCH -V2 0/9] memcg: add HugeTLB resource tracking
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2012-03-01 22:40:32
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:46:11 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" [off-list ref] wrote:
This patchset implements a memory controller extension to control HugeTLB allocations. It is similar to the existing hugetlb quota support in that, the limit is enforced at mmap(2) time and not at fault time. HugeTLB's quota mechanism limits the number of huge pages that can allocated per superblock. For shared mappings we track the regions mapped by a task along with the memcg. We keep the memory controller charged even after the task that did mmap(2) exits. Uncharge happens during truncate. For Private mappings we charge and uncharge from the current task cgroup.
I haven't begin to get my head around this yet, but I'd like to draw your attention to https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/15/548. That fix has been hanging around for a while, but I haven't done anything with it yet because I don't like its additional blurring of the separation between hugetlb core code and hugetlbfs. I want to find time to sit down and see if the fix can be better architected but haven't got around to that yet. I expect that your patches will conflict at least mechanically with David's, which is not a big issue. But I wonder whether your patches will copy the same bug into other places, and whether you can think of a tidier way of addressing the bug which David is seeing? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>