On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 23:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Hugh Dickins [off-list ref] wrote:

Hmm, at first glance at the patch, it seems far complicated than
I expected

Right, this is just a rollup of assorted changes,
yet to be presented properly as an understandable series.

and added much checks and hooks to lru path...

Actually, I think it removes more than it adds; while trying not
to increase the overhead of lookup_page_cgroup()s and locking.

quoted

Okay, here it is: my usual mix of cleanup and functional changes.
There's work by Ying and others in here - will apportion authorship
more fairly when splitting.  If you're looking through it at all,
the place to start would be memcontrol.c's lock_page_lru_irqsave().

Thank you. This seems inetersting patch. Hmm...what I think of now is..
In most case, pages are newly allocated and charged ,and then, added to LRU.
pc->mem_cgroup never changes while pages are on LRU.

I have a fix for corner cases as to do

	1. lock lru
	2. remove-page-from-lru
	3. overwrite pc->mem_cgroup
	4. add page to lru again
	5. unlock lru

That is indeed the sequence which __mem_cgroup_commit_charge() follows
after the patch.

But it optimizes out the majority of cases when no such lru operations
are needed (optimizations best presented in a separate patch), while
being careful about the tricky case when the page is on lru_add_pvecs,
and may get on to an lru at any moment.

And since it uses a separate lock for each memcg-zone's set of lrus,
must take care that both lock and lru in 4 and 5 are different from
those in 1 and 2.

And blindly believe pc->mem_cgroup regardless of PCG_USED bit at LRU handling.

That's right.  The difficulty comes when Used is cleared while
the page is off lru, or page removed from lru while Used is clear:
once lock is dropped, we have no hold on the memcg, and must move
to root lru lest the old memcg get deleted.

The old Used + AcctLRU + pc->mem_cgroup puppetry used to achieve that
quite cleverly; but in distributing zone lru_locks over memcgs, we went
through a lot of crashes before we understood the subtlety of it; and
in most places were just fighting the way it shifted underneath us.

Now mem_cgroup_move_uncharged_to_root() makes the move explicit,
in just a few places.

Hm, per-zone-per-memcg lru locking is much easier if
 - we igonore PCG_USED bit at lru handling

I may or may not agree with you, depending on what you mean!

 - we never overwrite pc->mem_cgroup if the page is on LRU.

That's not the way I was thinking of it, but I think that's what we're doing.

 - if page may be added to LRU by pagevec etc.. while we overwrite
   pc->mem_cgroup, we always take lru_lock. This is our corner case.

Yes, the tricky case I mention above.

isn't it ? I posted a series of patch. I'm glad if you give me a
quick review.

I haven't glanced yet, will do so after an hour or two.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html