Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
From: Glauber Costa <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-13 20:11:46
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml, netdev
On 12/13/2011 05:59 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 13 décembre 2011 à 14:49 +0100, Christoph Paasch a écrit :quoted
now there are plenty of compiler-warnings when CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set: In file included from include/linux/tcp.h:211:0, from include/linux/ipv6.h:221, from include/net/ip_vs.h:23, from kernel/sysctl_binary.c:6: include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: ‘struct cgroup_subsys’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default] include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: ‘struct cgroup’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] include/net/sock.h:68:61: warning: ‘struct cgroup_subsys’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] include/net/sock.h:68:61: warning: ‘struct cgroup’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] Because struct cgroup is only declared if CONFIG_CGROUPS is enabled. (cfr. linux/cgroup.h)Yes, we probably need forward reference like this : Thanks ! [PATCH net-next] net: fix build error if CONFIG_CGROUPS=n Reported-by: Christoph Paasch<redacted> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<redacted>
I am deeply sorry about that. I was pretty sure I tested this case. But now that I looked into it, it occurs to me that I may have tested it only with the Memory Cgroup disabled, not with the master flag off. Thanks for spotting this