Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 5 authors, 2021-12-29

Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: Initialise xskb free_list_node

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-29 18:03:38
Also in: netdev

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:04:10 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
quoted
My $0.02 would be that if all relevant commits form a chain of fixes
it doesn't matter much which one you put in the tag. To me your
suggestion of going with 199d983bc015 makes most sense since from a
cursory look the direct issue doesn't really exist without that commit.

Plus we probably don't want 199d983bc015 to be backported until we
apply this fix, so it'd be good if "Fixes: 199d983bc015" appeared in
linux-next.

You can always put multiple Fixes tags on the commit, if you're unsure.  
It sounds that the fix should get into net and linus tree asap?
In such a case mabe take it into net directly?
Ack
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help