Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeleton
From: Andrii Nakryiko <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-28 18:06:58
Also in:
netdev
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [off-list ref] wrote:
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet.
Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them
together.
In c48e51c8b07a ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"),
I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF
object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when
included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a
separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of
subtests.
Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using
light skeleton, and convert all existing users.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---I like the simplicity, thanks. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 4 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c | 34 ++++++++-------- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c | 16 ++++---- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c | 14 +++---- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_sleep.c | 12 +++--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c | 14 +++---- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 6 +-- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_btf.c | 35 +++++++++++++++- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++-- .../bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module_libbpf.c | 28 ------------- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c | 12 +++--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk.c | 14 +++---- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_vprintk.c | 12 +++--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verif_stats.c | 6 +-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms_weak.c | 2 +- 15 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module_libbpf.c
[...]