Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 2 authors, 2021-09-17

Re: [PATCH 3/3] bpf/selftests: add test for writable bare tracepoint

From: Yonghong Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-16 23:47:04
Also in: netdev


On 9/16/21 6:55 AM, Hou Tao wrote:
Add a writable bare tracepoint in bpf_testmod module, and
trigger its calling when reading /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod
with a specific buffer length.
The patch cannot be applied cleanly with bpf-next tree.
Please rebase and resubmit.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <redacted>
---
  .../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h      | 15 +++++++
  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 10 +++++
  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |  5 +++
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c  | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c  | 14 +++++++
  5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
index 89c6d58e5dd6..11ee801e75e7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
@@ -34,6 +34,21 @@ DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_test_write_bare,
  	TP_ARGS(task, ctx)
  );
  
+#undef BPF_TESTMOD_DECLARE_TRACE
+#ifdef DECLARE_TRACE_WRITABLE
+#define BPF_TESTMOD_DECLARE_TRACE(call, proto, args, size) \
+	DECLARE_TRACE_WRITABLE(call, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), size)
+#else
+#define BPF_TESTMOD_DECLARE_TRACE(call, proto, args, size) \
+	DECLARE_TRACE(call, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
+#endif
+
+BPF_TESTMOD_DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare,
+	TP_PROTO(struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx *ctx),
+	TP_ARGS(ctx),
+	sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx)
+);
+
  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_EVENTS_H */
  
  #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 141d8da687d2..3d3fb16eaf8c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
  
  	trace_bpf_testmod_test_read(current, &ctx);
  
+	/* Magic number to enable writable tp */
+	if (len == 1024) {
+		struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx writable = {
+			.val = 1024,
+		};
+		trace_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare(&writable);
+		if (writable.ret)
+			return snprintf(buf, len, "%d\n", writable.val);
+	}
+
  	return -EIO; /* always fail */
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_read);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
index b3892dc40111..553d94214aa6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -17,4 +17,9 @@ struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx {
  	size_t len;
  };
  
+struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx {
+	bool ret;
+	int val;
+};
+
  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
index d85a69b7ce44..5565bcab1531 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
@@ -6,11 +6,39 @@
  
  static int duration;
  
+#define BPF_TESTMOD_PATH "/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod"
+
+static int trigger_module_test_writable(int *val)
+{
+	int fd, err;
+	char buf[1025];
Not critical, but do you need such a big stack size?
Maybe smaller one?
+	ssize_t rd;
+
+	fd = open(BPF_TESTMOD_PATH, O_RDONLY);
+	err = -errno;
+	if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", err))
+		return err;
+
+	rd = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1);
+	err = rd < 0 ? -errno : -EIO;
+	if (CHECK(rd <= 0, "testmod_file_read", "failed: %d\n", err)) {
Please use ASSERT_* macros. You can take a look at other self tests.
+		close(fd);
+		return err;
+	}
Put one blank line here and remove the following three blank lines.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	buf[rd] = '\0';
+
+	*val = strtol(buf, NULL, 0);
+
+	close(fd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
  static int trigger_module_test_read(int read_sz)
  {
  	int fd, err;
  
-	fd = open("/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod", O_RDONLY);
+	fd = open(BPF_TESTMOD_PATH, O_RDONLY);
  	err = -errno;
  	if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", err))
  		return err;
@@ -32,7 +60,7 @@ static int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz)
  	memset(buf, 'a', write_sz);
  	buf[write_sz-1] = '\0';
  
-	fd = open("/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod", O_WRONLY);
+	fd = open(BPF_TESTMOD_PATH, O_WRONLY);
  	err = -errno;
  	if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", err)) {
  		free(buf);
@@ -58,6 +86,7 @@ void test_module_attach(void)
  	struct test_module_attach__bss *bss;
  	struct bpf_link *link;
  	int err;
+	int writable_val;
  
  	skel = test_module_attach__open();
  	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open skeleton\n"))
@@ -90,6 +119,13 @@ void test_module_attach(void)
  	ASSERT_EQ(bss->fexit_ret, -EIO, "fexit_tet");
  	ASSERT_EQ(bss->fmod_ret_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fmod_ret");
  
+	bss->raw_tp_writable_bare_ret = 1;
+	bss->raw_tp_writable_bare_val = 511;
+	writable_val = 0;
+	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_writable(&writable_val), "trigger_writable");
+	ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_writable_bare_in_val, 1024, "writable_test");
+	ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_writable_bare_val, writable_val, "writable_test");
+
  	test_module_attach__detach(skel);
  
  	/* attach fentry/fexit and make sure it get's module reference */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
index bd37ceec5587..4f5c780fcd21 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
@@ -27,6 +27,20 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp_bare,
  	return 0;
  }
  
+int raw_tp_writable_bare_in_val = 0;
+int raw_tp_writable_bare_ret = 0;
+int raw_tp_writable_bare_val = 0;
+
+SEC("raw_tp_writable/bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare")
+int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp_writable_bare,
+	     struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx *writable)
+{
+	raw_tp_writable_bare_in_val = writable->val;
+	writable->ret = raw_tp_writable_bare_ret;
+	writable->val = raw_tp_writable_bare_val;
+	return 0;
+}
+
  __u32 tp_btf_read_sz = 0;
  
  SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_read")
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help