Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 5 authors, 2021-09-07

Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_branch_snapshot

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-09-03 08:28:33
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 09:57:05AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_branch_snapshot, void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_X86
+	return -ENOENT;
+#else
+	static const u32 br_entry_size = sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
+	u32 entry_cnt = size / br_entry_size;
+
+	if (unlikely(flags))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!buf || (size % br_entry_size != 0))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	entry_cnt = static_call(perf_snapshot_branch_stack)(buf, entry_cnt);
+
+	if (!entry_cnt)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	return entry_cnt * br_entry_size;
+#endif
+}
Do we really need that CONFIG_X86 thing? Seems rather bad practise.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help