Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 8 authors, 2021-07-15

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] platform/x86: intel_tdx_attest: Add TDX Guest attestation interface driver

From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2021-07-13 00:33:51
Also in: lkml, netdev, platform-driver-x86

Hi Dave,

On 7/8/21 5:38 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
Expensive and permanently fractures the direct map.

I'm struggling to figure out why the direct map is even touched here.
I think Sathya did it this way because the TD interface requires a physical address.
quoted
Why not just use a vmalloc area mapping?  You really just need *a*
decrypted mapping to the page.  You don't need to make *every* mapping
to the page decrypted.
Yes it would be possible to use vmap() on the page and only set the vmap encrypted by passing the 
right flags directly.
Is it alright to have non coherent mappings? If yes, any documentation reference for it?
That would avoid breaking up the direct mapping.
-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help