[PATCH bpf-next v6 2/2] bpf: allow to specify ifindex for skb in bpf_prog_test_run_skb
From: Dmitry Yakunin <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-03 09:06:12
Also in:
netdev
Subsystem:
bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [selftests] (test runners & infrastructure), kernel selftest framework, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
Now skb->dev is unconditionally set to the loopback device in current net namespace. But if we want to test bpf program which contains code branch based on ifindex condition (eg filters out localhost packets) it is useful to allow specifying of ifindex from userspace. This patch adds such option through ctx_in (__sk_buff) parameter. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yakunin <redacted> --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 736a596..99eb8c6 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c@@ -327,6 +327,12 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb) /* priority is allowed */ if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, priority), + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex))) + return -EINVAL; + + /* ifindex is allowed */ + + if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, ifindex), offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb))) return -EINVAL;
@@ -381,6 +387,7 @@ static void convert_skb_to___skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb) __skb->mark = skb->mark; __skb->priority = skb->priority; + __skb->ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex; __skb->tstamp = skb->tstamp; memcpy(__skb->cb, &cb->data, QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN); __skb->wire_len = cb->pkt_len;
@@ -391,6 +398,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr) { bool is_l2 = false, is_direct_pkt_access = false; + struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns; + struct net_device *dev = net->loopback_dev; u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in; u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat; struct __sk_buff *ctx = NULL;
@@ -432,7 +441,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, kfree(ctx); return -ENOMEM; } - sock_net_set(sk, current->nsproxy->net_ns); + sock_net_set(sk, net); sock_init_data(NULL, sk); skb = build_skb(data, 0);
@@ -446,7 +455,14 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN); __skb_put(skb, size); - skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev); + if (ctx && ctx->ifindex > 1) { + dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ctx->ifindex); + if (!dev) { + ret = -ENODEV; + goto out; + } + } + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev); skb_reset_network_header(skb); switch (skb->protocol) {
@@ -502,6 +518,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, ret = bpf_ctx_finish(kattr, uattr, ctx, sizeof(struct __sk_buff)); out: + if (dev && dev != net->loopback_dev) + dev_put(dev); kfree_skb(skb); bpf_sk_storage_free(sk); kfree(sk);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
index 7021b92..25de86a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void) .cb[3] = 4, .cb[4] = 5, .priority = 6, + .ifindex = 1, .tstamp = 7, .wire_len = 100, .gso_segs = 8,
@@ -92,6 +93,10 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void) "ctx_out_priority", "skb->priority == %d, expected %d\n", skb.priority, 7); + CHECK_ATTR(skb.ifindex != 1, + "ctx_out_ifindex", + "skb->ifindex == %d, expected %d\n", + skb.ifindex, 1); CHECK_ATTR(skb.tstamp != 8, "ctx_out_tstamp", "skb->tstamp == %lld, expected %d\n",
--
2.7.4