Re: No oob scheme defined for oobsize 224 on imx6ull board
From: Sascha Hauer <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-06 10:35:27
Hi, On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 05:11:11PM +0800, 郑小军 wrote:
Hi, all
I am trying to run barebox on my i.mx6ull board. I inherit from
nxp-imx6ull-evk. When I added nand flash support, system crashed. I
found that the pointer "chip->legacy.set_features" and
"chip->legacy.get_features" in nand_mxs.c was NULL.
I replaced it with nand_set_features() and nand_get_features().This looks like the correct solution for this. Care to send a patch?
Barebox didn't crash again, but I get the errors:
nand_base: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc
nand_base: Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAWP
nand_base: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 256 KiB, page size: 4096,
OOB size: 224
WARNING: at drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c:5591/nand_scan_tail()!
WARNING: No oob scheme defined for oobsize 224
mxs_nand 1806000.nand-controller@1806000.of: probe failed:
Invalid argument
You are falling into:
/*
* If no default placement scheme is given, select an appropriate one.
*/
if (!mtd->ooblayout &&
!(ecc->mode == NAND_ECC_SOFT && ecc->algo == NAND_ECC_BCH)) {
...
}
Normally mtd->ooblayout should be set at this point. the nand_mxs driver
currently misses to set it. I think you have to adopt
gpmi_ooblayout_ecc() and gpmi_ooblayout_free() from the Linux driver for
barebox.
This bug seems to trigger for NANDs with bigger page sizes. I only
tested the last NAND layer update with smaller page sizes. So it's not
you who misses something, it's me who missed something ;)
Regards,
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox