Re: [PATCH] ARM/imx/pcm043: increase size of "self" partition
From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-30 11:10:38
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:03:30PM +0200, Jan Weitzel wrote:
Am Freitag, den 27.07.2012, 10:41 +0200 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:quoted
A barebox image generated from pcm043_defconfig doesn't fit into the 0x40000 byte sized self partition as of v2012.07.0-153-g14c8c60 (command: add missing EXPORT_SYMBOL for find_cmd) . Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted> --- arch/arm/boards/pcm043/pcm043.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/pcm043/pcm043.c b/arch/arm/boards/pcm043/pcm043.c index b1bf8ef..7ccd973 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boards/pcm043/pcm043.c +++ b/arch/arm/boards/pcm043/pcm043.c@@ -153,15 +153,15 @@ static int imx35_devices_init(void) if ((reg & 0xc00) == 0x800) { /* reset mode: external boot */ switch ( (reg >> 25) & 0x3) { case 0x01: /* NAND is the source */ - devfs_add_partition("nand0", 0x00000, 0x40000, DEVFS_PARTITION_FIXED, "self_raw"); + devfs_add_partition("nand0", 0x00000, 0x60000, DEVFS_PARTITION_FIXED, "self_raw");What do you think about SZ_128K + SZ_256K ? Maybe SZ_512K is even better.
I don't like SZ_128K + SZ_256K, which in my eyes is more ugly than a hex constant. And using 512 kiB seems unnecessary to me. I'd like to stay with 0x60000. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox