# Re: \[PATCH\] vhost\_vdpa: unset vq irq before freeing irq

- From: Michael S. Tsirkin \<mst@redhat.com\>
- Date: 2021-09-15 07:26:50 
- List: virtualization
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/virtualization/2021/09/1509040
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/lkml/2021/09/1509007/t.md

```text
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 02:39:32PM +0800, Wu Zongyong wrote:
> Currently we unset vq irq after freeing irq and that will result in
> error messages:
> 
>   pi_update_irte: failed to update PI IRTE
>   irq bypass consumer (token 000000005a07a12b) unregistration fails: -22
> 
> This patch solves this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wu Zongyong <redacted>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index f41d081777f5..15bae2290bf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,10 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
>  	if (status != 0 && (ops->get_status(vdpa) & ~status) != 0)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if ((status_old & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) && !(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
> +		for (i = 0; i < nvqs; i++)
> +			vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq(v, i);
> +

If we do this before reset like this then the device might assert the
irq, might it not?

>  	if (status == 0) {
>  		ret = ops->reset(vdpa);
>  		if (ret)


> @@ -184,10 +188,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
>  		for (i = 0; i < nvqs; i++)
>  			vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(v, i);
>  
> -	if ((status_old & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) && !(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
> -		for (i = 0; i < nvqs; i++)
> -			vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq(v, i);
> -
>  	return 0;



>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
```