@@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)*actuallyinuse(e.g.,tryingtoreloadthedriver).*/if(vm->plugged_size){-vm->unplug_all_required=1;+vm->unplug_all_required=true;dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev,"unplugging all memory is required\n");}
@@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)*actuallyinuse(e.g.,tryingtoreloadthedriver).*/if(vm->plugged_size){-vm->unplug_all_required=1;+vm->unplug_all_required=true;dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev,"unplugging all memory is required\n");}
@@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)*actuallyinuse(e.g.,tryingtoreloadthedriver).*/if(vm->plugged_size){-vm->unplug_all_required=1;+vm->unplug_all_required=true;dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev,"unplugging all memory is required\n");}
@@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)*actuallyinuse(e.g.,tryingtoreloadthedriver).*/if(vm->plugged_size){-vm->unplug_all_required=1;+vm->unplug_all_required=true;dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev,"unplugging all memory is required\n");}
Looks like it was only on virtualization@ and a couple of people on cc.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2020-December/051662.html
Interestingly, I cannot find the follow-up ("[PATCH] virtio-mem: use
boolean value when setting vm->unplug_all_required") in the mailing list
archives, even though it has virtualization@ on cc.
Unsurprising that I didn't merge it then ;)
Want to send your ack on this one?
@@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)*actuallyinuse(e.g.,tryingtoreloadthedriver).*/if(vm->plugged_size){-vm->unplug_all_required=1;+vm->unplug_all_required=true;dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev,"unplugging all memory is required\n");}
Looks like it was only on virtualization@ and a couple of people on cc.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2020-December/051662.html
Interestingly, I cannot find the follow-up ("[PATCH] virtio-mem: use
boolean value when setting vm->unplug_all_required") in the mailing list
archives, even though it has virtualization@ on cc.
@@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)*actuallyinuse(e.g.,tryingtoreloadthedriver).*/if(vm->plugged_size){-vm->unplug_all_required=1;+vm->unplug_all_required=true;dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev,"unplugging all memory is required\n");}
Looks like it was only on virtualization@ and a couple of people on cc.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2020-December/051662.html
Interestingly, I cannot find the follow-up ("[PATCH] virtio-mem: use
boolean value when setting vm->unplug_all_required") in the mailing list
archives, even though it has virtualization@ on cc.
Unsurprising that I didn't merge it then ;)
Well, you were on cc ;)
Hmm true. Found it now.
quoted
Want to send your ack on this one?
Sure
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
Added yours and the original Signed-off-by.
Thanks!