On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini [off-list ref] wrote:

As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case
is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in
giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple
of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to
address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work.

It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :(

I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree,
otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge.  But I'll await your
push before pushing to Linus next merge window.

Thanks,
Rusty.