Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
        https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <redacted>

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.10.12-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: 324e71045b28705e935d8136fac983c6aa808e06
git describe: v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28

No regressions (compared to build v5.10.11)

No fixes (compared to build v5.10.11)

Ran 54244 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* kselftest
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* fwts
* kunit
* rcutorture
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:52:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
        https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <redacted>

Thanks for testing these and letting me know.

greg k-h

On 29/01/2021 18:22, Naresh Kamboju wrote:

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Replying here because I don't have the original.

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    12 builds:	12 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    65 tests:	65 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.12-rc1-g324e71045b28
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
                tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon


-- 
nvpublic