Patch "net/mlx5e: Schedule overflow check work to mlx5e workqueue" has been added to the 4.12-stable tree

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    net/mlx5e: Schedule overflow check work to mlx5e workqueue

to the 4.12-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     net-mlx5e-schedule-overflow-check-work-to-mlx5e-workqueue.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let [off-list ref] know about it.

From foo@baz Tue Aug  8 16:27:29 PDT 2017

From: Eugenia Emantayev <redacted>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:44:07 +0300
Subject: net/mlx5e: Schedule overflow check work to mlx5e workqueue

From: Eugenia Emantayev <redacted>


[ Upstream commit f08c39ed0bfb503c7b3e013cd40d036ce6a0941a ]

This is done in order to ensure that work will not run after the cleanup.

Fixes: ef9814deafd0 ('net/mlx5e: Add HW timestamping (TS) support')
Signed-off-by: Eugenia Emantayev <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_clock.c |   11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_clock.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_clock.c

@@ -114,13 +114,14 @@ static void mlx5e_timestamp_overflow(str
 	struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
 	struct mlx5e_tstamp *tstamp = container_of(dwork, struct mlx5e_tstamp,
 						   overflow_work);
+	struct mlx5e_priv *priv = container_of(tstamp, struct mlx5e_priv, tstamp);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	write_lock_irqsave(&tstamp->lock, flags);
 	timecounter_read(&tstamp->clock);
 	write_unlock_irqrestore(&tstamp->lock, flags);
-	schedule_delayed_work(&tstamp->overflow_work,
-			      msecs_to_jiffies(tstamp->overflow_period * 1000));
+	queue_delayed_work(priv->wq, &tstamp->overflow_work,
+			   msecs_to_jiffies(tstamp->overflow_period * 1000));
 }
 
 int mlx5e_hwstamp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr)

@@ -578,7 +579,7 @@ void mlx5e_timestamp_init(struct mlx5e_p
 	INIT_WORK(&tstamp->pps_info.out_work, mlx5e_pps_out);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&tstamp->overflow_work, mlx5e_timestamp_overflow);
 	if (tstamp->overflow_period)
-		schedule_delayed_work(&tstamp->overflow_work, 0);
+		queue_delayed_work(priv->wq, &tstamp->overflow_work, 0);
 	else
 		mlx5_core_warn(priv->mdev, "invalid overflow period, overflow_work is not scheduled\n");
 

@@ -614,8 +615,6 @@ void mlx5e_timestamp_cleanup(struct mlx5
 	}
 
 	cancel_work_sync(&tstamp->pps_info.out_work);
-
-	kfree(tstamp->ptp_info.pin_config);
-
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tstamp->overflow_work);
+	kfree(tstamp->ptp_info.pin_config);
 }

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from eugenia@mellanox.com are

queue-4.12/net-mlx5e-change-1pps-out-scheme.patch
queue-4.12/net-mlx5e-schedule-overflow-check-work-to-mlx5e-workqueue.patch
queue-4.12/net-mlx5e-fix-wrong-delay-calculation-for-overflow-check-scheduling.patch
queue-4.12/net-mlx5e-add-missing-support-for-ptp_clk_req_pps-request.patch
queue-4.12/net-mlx5e-fix-broken-disable-1pps-flow.patch
queue-4.12/net-mlx5-fix-mlx5_ifc_mtpps_reg_bits-structure-size.patch
queue-4.12/net-mlx5e-add-field-select-to-mtpps-register.patch