+ mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap.patch added to -mm tree
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: 2016-07-12 20:42:48
The patch titled
Subject: mm: thp: refix false positive BUG in page_move_anon_rmap()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: mm: thp: refix false positive BUG in page_move_anon_rmap()
The VM_BUG_ON_PAGE in page_move_anon_rmap() is more trouble than it's
worth: the syzkaller fuzzer hit it again. It's still wrong for some THP
cases, because linear_page_index() was never intended to apply to
addresses before the start of a vma.
That's easily fixed with a signed long cast inside linear_page_index();
and Dmitry has tested such a patch, to verify the false positive. But why
extend linear_page_index() just for this case? when the avoidance in
page_move_anon_rmap() has already grown ugly, and there's no reason for
the check at all (nothing else there is using address or index).
Remove address arg from page_move_anon_rmap(), remove VM_BUG_ON_PAGE,
remove CONFIG_DEBUG_VM PageTransHuge adjustment.
And one more thing: should the compound_head(page) be done inside or
outside page_move_anon_rmap()? It's usually pushed down to the lowest
level nowadays (and mm/memory.c shows no other explicit use of it), so I
think it's better done in page_move_anon_rmap() than by caller.
Fixes: 0798d3c022dc ("mm: thp: avoid false positive VM_BUG_ON_PAGE in page_move_anon_rmap()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.1607120444540.12528@eggly.anvils
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <redacted>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <redacted>
Cc: Rik van Riel <redacted>
Cc: <redacted> [4.5+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/rmap.h | 2 +-
mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 3 +--
mm/rmap.c | 9 +++------
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/rmap.h~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap include/linux/rmap.h--- a/include/linux/rmap.h~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap
+++ a/include/linux/rmap.h@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ struct anon_vma *page_get_anon_vma(struc /* * rmap interfaces called when adding or removing pte of page */ -void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long); +void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *); void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long, bool); void do_page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
diff -puN mm/hugetlb.c~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap mm/hugetlb.c
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c@@ -3383,7 +3383,7 @@ retry_avoidcopy: /* If no-one else is actually using this page, avoid the copy * and just make the page writable */ if (page_mapcount(old_page) == 1 && PageAnon(old_page)) { - page_move_anon_rmap(old_page, vma, address); + page_move_anon_rmap(old_page, vma); set_huge_ptep_writable(vma, address, ptep); return 0; }
diff -puN mm/memory.c~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap mm/memory.c
--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap
+++ a/mm/memory.c@@ -2399,8 +2399,7 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct * * Protected against the rmap code by * the page lock. */ - page_move_anon_rmap(compound_head(old_page), - vma, address); + page_move_anon_rmap(old_page, vma); } unlock_page(old_page); return wp_page_reuse(mm, vma, address, page_table, ptl,
diff -puN mm/rmap.c~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap mm/rmap.c
--- a/mm/rmap.c~mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap
+++ a/mm/rmap.c@@ -1084,23 +1084,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_mkclean); * page_move_anon_rmap - move a page to our anon_vma * @page: the page to move to our anon_vma * @vma: the vma the page belongs to - * @address: the user virtual address mapped * * When a page belongs exclusively to one process after a COW event, * that page can be moved into the anon_vma that belongs to just that * process, so the rmap code will not search the parent or sibling * processes. */ -void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page *page, - struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) +void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma) { struct anon_vma *anon_vma = vma->anon_vma; + page = compound_head(page); + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); VM_BUG_ON_VMA(!anon_vma, vma); - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) && PageTransHuge(page)) - address &= HPAGE_PMD_MASK; - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->index != linear_page_index(vma, address), page); anon_vma = (void *) anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON; /*
_ Patches currently in -mm which might be from hughd@google.com are mm-thp-refix-false-positive-bug-in-page_move_anon_rmap.patch shmem-get_unmapped_area-align-huge-page.patch