ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’:
ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4
[-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name),
"rclk%u", i);
Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’:
ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4
[-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name),
"rclk%u", i);
Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
thank you for the fix
this is a correct tag, and a correct target
3537│ for (i = 0; i < pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents; i++) {
upper bound of the loop is u8 (ok), but we assign it as an int (good)
3538│ pins[start_idx + i].pf = pf;
3539│ snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), "rclk%u", i);
compiler tries to be too smart here
anyway, it's better to have that warning gone instead of waiting for
a fix in the compiler
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
From: Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 9:57 AM
To: Korba, Przemyslaw <redacted>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning
On 2/23/26 15:31, Przemyslaw Korba wrote:
quoted
ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’:
ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4
[-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name),
"rclk%u", i);
Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
thank you for the fix
this is a correct tag, and a correct target
3537│ for (i = 0; i < pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents; i++) {
upper bound of the loop is u8 (ok), but we assign it as an int (good)
3538│ pins[start_idx + i].pf = pf;
3539│ snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), "rclk%u", i);
compiler tries to be too smart here
anyway, it's better to have that warning gone instead of waiting for
a fix in the compiler
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Date: 2026-02-25 09:59:45
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:31:55PM +0100, Przemyslaw Korba wrote:
ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’:
ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4
[-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name),
"rclk%u", i);
Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <redacted>
Hi Przemyslaw,
I agree that it is good to address this problem.
But is it a bug?
It seems to me that of the 8 bytes of pin_name, three are available for %u.
So values up to 999 can be safely formatted. And I suspect that
pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents is always significantly smaller than that.
If so, I'd suggest this is iwl-next material. And should not have
a Fixes tag. But you could cite the commit that introduced the problem
something like this (the part starting with 'commit' is the syntax for
citing commits):
Introduced by commit ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and
dynamic pin discovery")
...
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 11:00 AM
To: Korba, Przemyslaw <redacted>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:31:55PM +0100, Przemyslaw Korba wrote:
quoted
ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’:
ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4
[-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name),
"rclk%u", i);
Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <redacted>
Hi Przemyslaw,
I agree that it is good to address this problem.
But is it a bug?
It seems to me that of the 8 bytes of pin_name, three are available for %u.
So values up to 999 can be safely formatted. And I suspect that
pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents is always significantly smaller than that.
If so, I'd suggest this is iwl-next material. And should not have
a Fixes tag. But you could cite the commit that introduced the problem
something like this (the part starting with 'commit' is the syntax for
citing commits):
Introduced by commit ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and
dynamic pin discovery")
Thank you! I sent it to next, with updated commit message 😊
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Date: 2026-03-02 14:04:29
On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 12:01:12PM +0000, Korba, Przemyslaw wrote:
quoted
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 11:00 AM
To: Korba, Przemyslaw <redacted>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:31:55PM +0100, Przemyslaw Korba wrote:
quoted
ice_dpll.c: In function ‘ice_dpll_init’:
ice_dpll.c:3588:59: error: ‘%u’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 4
[-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name),
"rclk%u", i);
Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Korba <redacted>
Hi Przemyslaw,
I agree that it is good to address this problem.
But is it a bug?
It seems to me that of the 8 bytes of pin_name, three are available for %u.
So values up to 999 can be safely formatted. And I suspect that
pf->dplls.rclk.num_parents is always significantly smaller than that.
If so, I'd suggest this is iwl-next material. And should not have
a Fixes tag. But you could cite the commit that introduced the problem
something like this (the part starting with 'commit' is the syntax for
citing commits):
Introduced by commit ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and
dynamic pin discovery")
Thank you! I sent it to next, with updated commit message 😊