When the TX queue length reaches the threshold, the netdev watchdog
immediately detects a TX queue timeout.
This patch updates the trans_start timestamp of the transmit queue
on every asynchronous USB URB submission along the transmit path,
ensuring that the network watchdog accurately reflects ongoing
transmission activity.
Signed-off-by: insyelu <redacted>
---
v2: Update the transmit timestamp when submitting the USB URB.
---
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
index fa5192583860..880b59ed5422 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
@@ -2449,6 +2449,8 @@ static int r8152_tx_agg_fill(struct r8152 *tp, struct tx_agg *agg)
ret = usb_submit_urb(agg->urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (ret < 0)
usb_autopm_put_interface_async(tp->intf);
+ else
+ netif_trans_update(tp->netdev);
out_tx_fill:
return ret;
--
2.34.1
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:28:02AM +0800, insyelu wrote:
quoted hunk
When the TX queue length reaches the threshold, the netdev watchdog
immediately detects a TX queue timeout.
This patch updates the trans_start timestamp of the transmit queue
on every asynchronous USB URB submission along the transmit path,
ensuring that the network watchdog accurately reflects ongoing
transmission activity.
Signed-off-by: insyelu <redacted>
---
v2: Update the transmit timestamp when submitting the USB URB.
---
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
index fa5192583860..880b59ed5422 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
@@ -2449,6 +2449,8 @@ static int r8152_tx_agg_fill(struct r8152 *tp, struct tx_agg *agg)
ret = usb_submit_urb(agg->urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (ret < 0)
usb_autopm_put_interface_async(tp->intf);
+ else
+ netif_trans_update(tp->netdev);
out_tx_fill:
return ret;
--
2.34.1
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either
the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to
match). Please read the kernel file,
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for how to do this
correctly.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot