# Re: \[PATCH net-next\] bonding: Remove support for use\_carrier

- From: Nikolay Aleksandrov \<razor@blackwall.org\>
- Date: 2025-09-03 09:53:56 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2025/09/8534366
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2025/08/8534281/t.md

```text
On 9/3/25 12:50, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 9/2/25 19:11, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>> On 08/29, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
[snip]
>>>       return 0;
>>
>> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
>>
>> nit: any reason not to return -EINVAL here when the new value is not "1"?
>> You do it for the module param, but not for the sysfs file here.
>>
>
> bond options code already returns EINVAL for values not described in the option's value
> table, after Jay removed "0" from there it should automatically cause -EINVAL to be returned
>
>

Still fixing email problems, I see now that this is an old thread.
Please ignore my reply, sorry for the noise!

Cheers,
 Nik
```