# Re: \[PATCH v1 net-next 0/7\] af\_unix: Introduce SO\_INQ \& SCM\_INQ.

- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
- Date: 2025-07-09 01:30:02 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2025/07/11331990
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2025/07/11331469/t.md

```text
Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski [ref]:

On Wed,  2 Jul 2025 22:35:12 +0000 you wrote:
> We have an application that uses almost the same code for TCP and
> AF_UNIX (SOCK_STREAM).
> 
> The application uses TCP_INQ for TCP, but AF_UNIX doesn't have it
> and requires an extra syscall, ioctl(SIOCINQ) or getsockopt(SO_MEMINFO)
> as an alternative.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v1,net-next,1/7] af_unix: Don't hold unix_state_lock() in __unix_dgram_recvmsg().
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b429a5ad19cb
  - [v1,net-next,2/7] af_unix: Don't check SOCK_DEAD in unix_stream_read_skb().
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/772f01049c4b
  - [v1,net-next,3/7] af_unix: Don't use skb_recv_datagram() in unix_stream_read_skb().
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d0aac85449de
  - [v1,net-next,4/7] af_unix: Use cached value for SOCK_STREAM in unix_inq_len().
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f4e1fb04c123
  - [v1,net-next,5/7] af_unix: Cache state->msg in unix_stream_read_generic().
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8b77338eb2af
  - [v1,net-next,6/7] af_unix: Introduce SO_INQ.
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/df30285b3670
  - [v1,net-next,7/7] selftest: af_unix: Add test for SO_INQ.
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e0f60ba041a0

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html


```