# Re: \[PATCH v7 1/9\] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf

- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski \<krzk@kernel.org\>
- Date: 2025-02-03 16:02:03 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2025/02/2909925
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2025/02/2909784/t.md

```text
On 03/02/2025 16:17, Ninad Palsule wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> 
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
>> You still need to fix the subject. Why patch #1 has bindings but patch
>> #2 dt-bindings? Why can't this be consistent?
> 
> What is preferred now a days? bindings or dt-bindings?
dt-bindings. nowadays? submitting patches asks for this since 2018.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
```