Re: [PATCH] qsfp: Better handling of Page 03h netlink read failure

"netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-05-21
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Michal Kubecek <hidden> · 2024-05-21
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-05-21
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-05-21
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Michal Kubecek <hidden> · 2024-05-21
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-05-21
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2024-05-21
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-05-22
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> · 2024-05-22
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2024-05-22
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-05-23
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Michal Kubecek <hidden> · 2024-05-23
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> · 2024-05-23
Re: "netlink error: Invalid argument" with ethtool-5.13+ on recent kernels due to "ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule (-m)" - 25b64c66f58d3df0ad7272dda91c3ab06fe7a303, also no SFP-DOM support via netlink? · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2024-05-23
[PATCH] net/mlx4: Add support for EEPROM high pages query for QSFP/QSFP+/QSFP28 · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-07-08
Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4: Add support for EEPROM high pages query for QSFP/QSFP+/QSFP28 · Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> · 2024-07-08
Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4: Add support for EEPROM high pages query for QSFP/QSFP+/QSFP28 · Dan Merillat <hidden> · 2024-07-09
[PATCH] qsfp: Better handling of Page 03h netlink read failure · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-07-08
Re: [PATCH] qsfp: Better handling of Page 03h netlink read failure · Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> · 2024-07-08
Re: [PATCH] qsfp: Better handling of Page 03h netlink read failure · Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden> · 2024-07-31
Re: [PATCH] qsfp: Better handling of Page 03h netlink read failure · Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> · 2024-07-31

From: Krzysztof Olędzki <hidden>
Date: 2024-07-31 00:55:17

On 08.07.2024 at 09:12, Ido Schimmel wrote:

Hi, thanks for the patch. Some comments below (mainly about the
process).

Thank you so much Ido for your careful review, detailed feedback and
patience. I just re-sent both patches.

BTW: get_maintainer.pl for drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
also returned "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org", should I be also including it
in the future?

Thanks,
 Krzysztof

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help