# RE: \[EXT\] Re: \[PATCH v1 net\] page\_pool: Cap queue size to 32k.

- From: Ratheesh Kannoth \<rkannoth@marvell.com\>
- Date: 2023-08-14 08:07:33 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2023/08/2302085
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2023/08/2301940/t.md

```text
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 net] page_pool: Cap queue size to 32k.
> > Please find discussion at
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lore.kernel.org_l
> >
> I'm not the one who's going to apply this, but honestly, I don't think that will
> work as a commit message for such a change ...
> Sure, link to it by all means, but also summarize it and make sense of it for
> the commit message?

Why do you think it will not work ?. There is a long discussion about pros and cons of different approaches by 
Page pool maintainers in the discussion link.  However I  summarize it here, as commit message, it will 
Lead to some more questions by reviewers. 

-Ratheesh

 
 

```