Re: [RESEND][PATCH] net: cpsw: fix obtaining mac address for am3517

2 messages, 2 authors, 2023-06-30 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [RESEND][PATCH] net: cpsw: fix obtaining mac address for am3517

From: Måns Rullgård <hidden>
Date: 2023-06-24 14:36:34

Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] writes:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 03:24:47PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
quoted
Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:10:59PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
quoted
From: Jeroen Hofstee <redacted>

Commit b6745f6e4e63 ("drivers: net: cpsw: davinci_emac: move reading mac
id to common file") did not only move the code for an am3517, it also
added the slave parameter, resulting in an invalid (all zero) mac address
being returned for an am3517, since it only has a single emac
Hi Mans

If there is only a single emac, why is the function being called with
slave=1? Given the description, it seems like you are fixing the wrong
problem.
See previous discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d8ad5cab-5183-cddf-fa9a-4e7b9b8c9377@victronenergy.com/
Hi Måns

O.K. did i mention memory of a goldfish?

This is the sort of detail that should be in the commit
message. Otherwise reviewers are going to ask for an explanation, even
if it has been explained once, 6 years ago.

I assume you also want this back ported to stable? Please add a Fixed:
tag, and a Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org tag. And set the patch subject
to [PATCH net v3] to indicate this is for the net tree, not net-next.
I give up.  It's not worth my time.  This is why people hoard patches
rather than sending them upstream.

-- 
Måns Rullgård

Re: [RESEND][PATCH] net: cpsw: fix obtaining mac address for am3517

From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: 2023-06-30 07:23:01

Hi,

* Måns Rullgård [off-list ref] [230624 14:36]:
Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I assume you also want this back ported to stable? Please add a Fixed:
tag, and a Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org tag. And set the patch subject
to [PATCH net v3] to indicate this is for the net tree, not net-next.
I give up.  It's not worth my time.  This is why people hoard patches
rather than sending them upstream.
Maybe just give it one more go filing the proper paperwork :) It would be
nice to have it in stable too so IMO it's worth the few more hoops to
addthe tags for automating picking it to stable kernels.

Regards,

Tony
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help