@@ -1576,13 +1575,6 @@ void rtl92se_set_beacon_related_registers(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)*otheradhocSTA*/rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv,BCN_ERR_THRESH,100);-/* Beacon Time Configuration */-if(mac->opmode==NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)-bcntime_cfg|=(bcn_cw<<BCN_TCFG_CW_SHIFT);--/* TODO: bcn_ifs may required to be changed on ASIC */-bcntime_cfg|=bcn_ifs<<BCN_TCFG_IFS;-/*for beacon changed */rtl92s_phy_set_beacon_hwreg(hw,mac->beacon_interval);}
From: Simon Horman <hidden> Date: 2023-02-28 11:07:18
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:11:32AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
Variable bcntime_cfg is not effectively used, so delete it.
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:6: warning: variable 'bcntime_cfg' set but not used.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <redacted>
Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=4240
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <redacted>
Hi Jiapeng Chong,
this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <redacted>
While reviewing this gcc 12.2.0 told me:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:25: error: unused variable 'bcn_ifs' [-Werror=unused-variable]
1555 | u16 bcn_cw = 6, bcn_ifs = 0xf;
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:13: error: unused variable 'bcn_cw' [-Werror=unused-variable]
1555 | u16 bcn_cw = 6, bcn_ifs = 0xf;
| ^~~~~~
So perhaps you could consider sending another patch to remove them too.
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Horman <redacted>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 7:07 PM
To: Jiapeng Chong <redacted>
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>; kvalo@kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com;
kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Abaci Robot [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192se: Remove the unused variable bcntime_cfg
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:11:32AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
quoted
Variable bcntime_cfg is not effectively used, so delete it.
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:6: warning: variable 'bcntime_cfg' set but not
Hi Jiapeng Chong,
this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <redacted>
While reviewing this gcc 12.2.0 told me:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:25: error: unused variable 'bcn_ifs'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
1555 | u16 bcn_cw = 6, bcn_ifs = 0xf;
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:13: error: unused variable 'bcn_cw'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
1555 | u16 bcn_cw = 6, bcn_ifs = 0xf;
| ^~~~~~
So perhaps you could consider sending another patch to remove them too.
These errors are introduced by this patch, so please fix them together by this
patch.
Ping-Ke
From: Simon Horman <hidden> Date: 2023-03-01 10:39:29
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 12:32:38AM +0000, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Horman <redacted>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 7:07 PM
To: Jiapeng Chong <redacted>
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>; kvalo@kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com;
kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Abaci Robot [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192se: Remove the unused variable bcntime_cfg
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:11:32AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
quoted
Variable bcntime_cfg is not effectively used, so delete it.
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:6: warning: variable 'bcntime_cfg' set but not
Hi Jiapeng Chong,
this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <redacted>
While reviewing this gcc 12.2.0 told me:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:25: error: unused variable 'bcn_ifs'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
1555 | u16 bcn_cw = 6, bcn_ifs = 0xf;
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c:1555:13: error: unused variable 'bcn_cw'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
1555 | u16 bcn_cw = 6, bcn_ifs = 0xf;
| ^~~~~~
So perhaps you could consider sending another patch to remove them too.
These errors are introduced by this patch, so please fix them together by this
patch.
Yes, indeed. Sorry for missing that important point.
Had I noticed it my advice would have been the same as yours.