[PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

Subsystems: amd xgbe driver, networking drivers, the rest

STALE1313d LANDED

Landed in mainline as bbe641866318 on 2023-02-07.

7 messages, 6 authors, 2023-02-16 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-02-03 12:16:03

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:

drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd,  enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
 2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int,  unsigned int)'
  391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ideally there should not be any forward declarations here, which
would make it easier to show that there is no unbounded recursion.
I tried fixing this but could not figure out how to avoid the
recursive call.

As a hotfix, address only the broken prototype to fix the build
problem instead.

Fixes: 4f3b20bfbb75 ("amd-xgbe: add support for rx-adaptation")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c
index 7d88caa4e623..16e7fb2c0dae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c

@@ -390,7 +390,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(xgbe_phy_comm_lock);
 static enum xgbe_an_mode xgbe_phy_an_mode(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata);
 static void xgbe_phy_rrc(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata);
 static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
-					unsigned int cmd, unsigned int sub_cmd);
+					enum xgbe_mb_cmd cmd,
+					enum xgbe_mb_subcmd sub_cmd);
 
 static int xgbe_phy_i2c_xfer(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
 			     struct xgbe_i2c_op *i2c_op)

-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

From: Simon Horman <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-04 13:19:07

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 01:15:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:

drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd,  enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
 2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int,  unsigned int)'
  391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ideally there should not be any forward declarations here, which
would make it easier to show that there is no unbounded recursion.
I tried fixing this but could not figure out how to avoid the
recursive call.

As a hotfix, address only the broken prototype to fix the build
problem instead.

Fixes: 4f3b20bfbb75 ("amd-xgbe: add support for rx-adaptation")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <redacted>

Re: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

From: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Date: 2023-02-06 04:09:30


On 2/3/2023 5:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:

drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd,  enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
 2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int,  unsigned int)'
  391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ideally there should not be any forward declarations here, which
would make it easier to show that there is no unbounded recursion.
I tried fixing this but could not figure out how to avoid the
recursive call.

As a hotfix, address only the broken prototype to fix the build
problem instead.

Fixes: 4f3b20bfbb75 ("amd-xgbe: add support for rx-adaptation")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>

Thanks,
Shyam

quoted hunk

---
 drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c
index 7d88caa4e623..16e7fb2c0dae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c

@@ -390,7 +390,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(xgbe_phy_comm_lock);
 static enum xgbe_an_mode xgbe_phy_an_mode(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata);
 static void xgbe_phy_rrc(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata);
 static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
-					unsigned int cmd, unsigned int sub_cmd);
+					enum xgbe_mb_cmd cmd,
+					enum xgbe_mb_subcmd sub_cmd);
 
 static int xgbe_phy_i2c_xfer(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
 			     struct xgbe_i2c_op *i2c_op)

Re: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-02-07 06:28:46

On Fri,  3 Feb 2023 13:15:36 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:

drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd,  enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
 2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int,  unsigned int)'
  391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks for the fix. What's the compiler / extra flags you're using?
Doesn't pop up on our setups..

Re: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2023-02-07 06:40:40

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]:

On Fri,  3 Feb 2023 13:15:36 +0100 you wrote:

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:

drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd,  enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
 2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int,  unsigned int)'
  391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bbe641866318

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Re: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

From: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Date: 2023-02-07 06:54:46


On 2/7/2023 11:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

On Fri,  3 Feb 2023 13:15:36 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:

drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd,  enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
 2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int,  unsigned int)'
  391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks for the fix. What's the compiler / extra flags you're using?
Doesn't pop up on our setups..

Yes please. Even this does not pop on our build systems too. Would like
to know those extra compiler flags.

Thanks,
Shyam

Re: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: fix mismatched prototype

From: Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
Date: 2023-02-16 03:25:27


On 2/7/2023 12:24 PM, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:


On 2/7/2023 11:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Fri,  3 Feb 2023 13:15:36 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:

drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd,  enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
  2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int,  unsigned int)'
   391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks for the fix. What's the compiler / extra flags you're using?
Doesn't pop up on our setups..

Yes please. Even this does not pop on our build systems too. Would like
to know those extra compiler flags.

Hi Arnd,

Gentle reminder!

Please share the compiler details / additional flags used to reproduce 
this warning.

Thanks,
Raju

Thanks,
Shyam

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help