[PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

Subsystems: networking [ethtool], networking [general], the rest

STALE1360d

6 messages, 5 authors, 2022-11-22 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: Maxim Korotkov <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-21 07:57:22

The value of an arithmetic expression "n * id.data" is subject
to possible overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger data
type before performing arithmetic. Added cast of first operand to u64
for avoiding overflow.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 2adc6edcaec0 ("ethtool: fix error handling in ethtool_phys_id")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <redacted>
---
 net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
index 6a7308de192d..cf87e53c2e74 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
 	} else {
 		/* Driver expects to be called at twice the frequency in rc */
 		int n = rc * 2, interval = HZ / n;
-		u64 count = n * id.data, i = 0;
+		u64 count = (u64)n * id.data, i = 0;
 
 		do {
 			rtnl_lock();
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2022-11-21 14:13:42

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:56:18AM +0300, Maxim Korotkov wrote:
quoted hunk
The value of an arithmetic expression "n * id.data" is subject
to possible overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger data
type before performing arithmetic. Added cast of first operand to u64
for avoiding overflow.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 2adc6edcaec0 ("ethtool: fix error handling in ethtool_phys_id")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <redacted>
---
 net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
index 6a7308de192d..cf87e53c2e74 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
 	} else {
 		/* Driver expects to be called at twice the frequency in rc */
 		int n = rc * 2, interval = HZ / n;
-		u64 count = n * id.data, i = 0;
+		u64 count = (u64)n * id.data, i = 0;

How about moving the code around a bit, change n to a u64 and drop the
cast? Does this look correct?

		int interval = HZ / rc / 2;
		u64 n = rc * 2;
		u64 count = n * id.data;

		i = 0;

I just don't like casts, they suggest the underlying types are wrong,
so should fix that, not add a cast.

	Andrew

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: Alexander Lobakin <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-21 15:11:18

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:10:18 +0100
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:56:18AM +0300, Maxim Korotkov wrote:
quoted
The value of an arithmetic expression "n * id.data" is subject
to possible overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger data
type before performing arithmetic. Added cast of first operand to u64
for avoiding overflow.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 2adc6edcaec0 ("ethtool: fix error handling in ethtool_phys_id")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <redacted>
---
 net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
index 6a7308de192d..cf87e53c2e74 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
 	} else {
 		/* Driver expects to be called at twice the frequency in rc */
 		int n = rc * 2, interval = HZ / n;
-		u64 count = n * id.data, i = 0;
+		u64 count = (u64)n * id.data, i = 0;

How about moving the code around a bit, change n to a u64 and drop the
cast? Does this look correct?

		int interval = HZ / rc / 2;
		u64 n = rc * 2;
		u64 count = n * id.data;

		i = 0;

I just don't like casts, they suggest the underlying types are wrong,
so should fix that, not add a cast.
This particular one is absolutely fine. When you want to multiply
u32 by u32, you always need a cast, otherwise the result will be
truncated. mul_u32_u32() does it the very same way[0].
	Andrew
[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc6/source/include/linux/math64.h#L153

Thanks,
Olek

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-11-21 20:13:08

On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:56:18 +0300 Maxim Korotkov wrote:
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 2adc6edcaec0 ("ethtool: fix error handling in ethtool_phys_id")
I'm leaning towards dropping the fixes tag, and applying to -next.
Drivers returning high enough rc to cause an overflow seems theoretical, 
and is pretty harmless. Please LMK if I'm missing something.

RE: [PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2022-11-21 21:30:25

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Lobakin <redacted>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 7:03 AM
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Lobakin, Alexandr <redacted>; Maxim Korotkov
[off-list ref]; David S. Miller [off-list ref]; Eric
Dumazet [off-list ref]; Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]; Paolo
Abeni [off-list ref]; Guangbin Huang
[off-list ref]; Tom Rix [off-list ref]; Marco Bonelli
[off-list ref]; Edward Cree [off-list ref];
netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; lvc-
project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:10:18 +0100
quoted
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:56:18AM +0300, Maxim Korotkov wrote:
quoted
The value of an arithmetic expression "n * id.data" is subject
to possible overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger data
type before performing arithmetic. Added cast of first operand to u64
for avoiding overflow.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 2adc6edcaec0 ("ethtool: fix error handling in ethtool_phys_id")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <redacted>
---
 net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
index 6a7308de192d..cf87e53c2e74 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev,
void __user *useraddr)
quoted
quoted
 	} else {
 		/* Driver expects to be called at twice the frequency in rc */
 		int n = rc * 2, interval = HZ / n;
-		u64 count = n * id.data, i = 0;
+		u64 count = (u64)n * id.data, i = 0;

How about moving the code around a bit, change n to a u64 and drop the
cast? Does this look correct?

		int interval = HZ / rc / 2;
		u64 n = rc * 2;
		u64 count = n * id.data;

		i = 0;

I just don't like casts, they suggest the underlying types are wrong,
so should fix that, not add a cast.
This particular one is absolutely fine. When you want to multiply
u32 by u32, you always need a cast, otherwise the result will be
truncated. mul_u32_u32() does it the very same way[0].
Why not just use mul_u32_u32 then?

Thanks,
Jake
quoted
	Andrew
[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-
rc6/source/include/linux/math64.h#L153

Thanks,
Olek

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: Maxim Korotkov <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-22 06:54:06

Ok, I'll replace cast to macro in patch V2

On 22.11.2022 00:30, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Lobakin <redacted>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 7:03 AM
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Lobakin, Alexandr <redacted>; Maxim Korotkov
[off-list ref]; David S. Miller [off-list ref]; Eric
Dumazet [off-list ref]; Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]; Paolo
Abeni [off-list ref]; Guangbin Huang
[off-list ref]; Tom Rix [off-list ref]; Marco Bonelli
[off-list ref]; Edward Cree [off-list ref];
netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; lvc-
project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: avoiding integer overflow in ethtool_phys_id()

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:10:18 +0100
quoted
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:56:18AM +0300, Maxim Korotkov wrote:
quoted
The value of an arithmetic expression "n * id.data" is subject
to possible overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger data
type before performing arithmetic. Added cast of first operand to u64
for avoiding overflow.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 2adc6edcaec0 ("ethtool: fix error handling in ethtool_phys_id")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <redacted>
---
  net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
index 6a7308de192d..cf87e53c2e74 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev,
void __user *useraddr)
quoted
quoted
   } else {
           /* Driver expects to be called at twice the frequency in rc */
           int n = rc * 2, interval = HZ / n;
-         u64 count = n * id.data, i = 0;
+         u64 count = (u64)n * id.data, i = 0;

How about moving the code around a bit, change n to a u64 and drop the
cast? Does this look correct?

             int interval = HZ / rc / 2;
             u64 n = rc * 2;
             u64 count = n * id.data;

             i = 0;

I just don't like casts, they suggest the underlying types are wrong,
so should fix that, not add a cast.
This particular one is absolutely fine. When you want to multiply
u32 by u32, you always need a cast, otherwise the result will be
truncated. mul_u32_u32() does it the very same way[0].
Why not just use mul_u32_u32 then?

Thanks,
Jake
quoted
quoted
     Andrew
[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-
rc6/source/include/linux/math64.h#L153

Thanks,
Olek
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help