Regarding "xfrm: Add compat layer" when running arm/arm64

From: Beckius, Mikael <hidden>
Date: 2022-10-20 17:15:36
Subsystem: networking [general], networking [ipsec], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Steffen Klassert, Herbert Xu, Linus Torvalds

Regarding "xfrm: Add compat layer" described in: https://lwn.net/Articles/832081/ I am trying to understand how it is intended to work when running a 32-bit arm user space on top of an arm 64-bit kernel?
 
In the arm case it appears the structures have the same size, and it also appears to be working fine without CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT if adding the small modification seen below. The patch itself is not import but rather the aim is simply to have xfrm user working on arm/arm64 without custom modifications.
 
Thanks,
Micke

From 15ae02b40d0e1413aaae4fcc3cceafd9b935624c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 
From: Mikael Beckius <redacted>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:29:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Allow CONFIG_XFRM_USER to run on arm/arm64 as is

Not sure if there is actually a need for a compat translator
on arm64. The XFRM structs have the same size on arm and
arm64 but there might be more to it even though all the
tests pass.

Signed-off-by: Mikael Beckius <redacted>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 ++
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c  | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 91c32a3b6924..628455f6e180 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -2442,6 +2442,7 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
      if (IS_ERR(data))
            return PTR_ERR(data);
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT)
      if (in_compat_syscall()) {
            struct xfrm_translator *xtr = xfrm_get_translator();
 
@@ -2457,6 +2458,7 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
                  return err;
            }
      }
+#endif
 
      err = -EINVAL;
      rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 2ff017117730..587b9001481a 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2877,6 +2877,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
      if (!netlink_net_capable(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
            return -EPERM;
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT)
      if (in_compat_syscall()) {
            struct xfrm_translator *xtr = xfrm_get_translator();
 
@@ -2891,6 +2892,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
            if (nlh64)
                  nlh = nlh64;
      }
+#endif
 
      if ((type == (XFRM_MSG_GETSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE) ||
           type == (XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE)) &&
-- 
2.28.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help