DORMANTno replies LANDED

Landed in mainline as 62fc770d90ef on 2022-08-04.

[PATCH v3 bpf 2/3] bpf: Update bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify that attaching to functions is not ABI

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-08-02 17:39:19
Also in: bpf, linux-doc
Subsystem: bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), documentation, the rest · Maintainers: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Jonathan Corbet, Linus Torvalds

This patch updates bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify that the ability to
attach a BPF program to an arbitrary function in the kernel does not
make that function become part of the Linux kernel's ABI.

[ paulmck: Apply Daniel Borkmann feedback. ]

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst
index 2ed9128cfbec8..a06ae8a828e3d 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst
@@ -279,3 +279,15 @@ cc (congestion-control) implementations.  If any of these kernel
 functions has changed, both the in-tree and out-of-tree kernel tcp cc
 implementations have to be changed.  The same goes for the bpf
 programs and they have to be adjusted accordingly.
+
+Q: Attaching to arbitrary kernel functions is an ABI?
+-----------------------------------------------------
+Q: BPF programs can be attached to many kernel functions.  Do these
+kernel functions become part of the ABI?
+
+A: NO.
+
+The kernel function prototypes will change, and BPF programs attaching to
+them will need to change.  The BPF compile-once-run-everywhere (CO-RE)
+should be used in order to make it easier to adapt your BPF programs to
+different versions of the kernel.
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help