RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] ice: add support for Auto FEC with FEC disabled via ETHTOOL_SFECPARAM
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2022-08-24 21:29:52
-----Original Message----- From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 3:18 PM To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Greenwalt, Paul <redacted> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] ice: add support for Auto FEC with FEC disabled via ETHTOOL_SFECPARAM On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:04:38 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:quoted
The default Link Establishment State Machine (LESM) behavior does notLESM is the algo as specified by the IEEE standard? If so could you add the citation (section of the spec where it's defined)? Is disabling the only customization we may want?
Ok I got information from the other folks here. LESM is not a standard its just the name we used internally for how the firmware establishes link. I'll rephrase this whole section and clarify it. I also clarified whats going on here in https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CO1PR11MB50895C42C04A408CF6151023D6739@CO1PR11MB5089.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ (local) Basically: the firmware has a process for automatically selecting FEC mode. On older firmware, this process didn't include the possibility of selecting "No FEC", or in other words of disabling FEC. The process firmware uses is a state machine that goes through the FEC modes known to be supported by the media type. Some of our customers were confused about this and have asked if it was possible to allow disabling FEC. This is distinct from manually setting FEC_OFF, because it lets the firmwares existing state machine determine of the disabled mode is suitable or not. I understand it as the goal of being able to say "automatically select FEC for me, but if No FEC is suitable allow that". The new firmware requires manually opting in with a new bit, and we don't want to change existing behavior, hence the new approach to using both AUTO and OFF together. If we instead go with "use the new mode when its available" then there is no way for users to know this easily since it would just depend on the firmware version. I've got a proposed reword to the commit message as follows: Users can request automatic selection of FEC mode via the ETHTOOL_MSG_FEC_SET netlink message (or ETHTOOL_SFECPARAM ioctl). The ice driver implements this by asking firmware to select a suitable mode. The firmware selects a FEC mode automatically based on a table of supported FEC modes for the media type. Older versions of firmware will never select "No FEC" (i.e. disabling FEC). Newer versions of firmware support an automatic mode which also allows selecting the "No FEC" mode. To support this, accept the ETHTOOL_FEC_AUTO | ETHTOOL_FEC_OFF as a request to automatically select an appropriate FEC mode including potentially disabling FEC. This is done so that the existing behavior of ETHTOOL_FEC_AUTO remains unchanged, and users must actively select the new behavior. This is important since we do not want to change the behavior purely based on the firmware version. Additionally, this allows reporting an error if the mode is requested on a device still operating the older firmware version. This is distinct from ETHTOOL_FEC_OFF because that selection will always simply disable FEC without going through the firmware automatic selection state machine. This *does* mean that ice is now accepting one "bitwise OR" set for FEC configuration, which is somewhat against the recommendations made in 6dbf94b264e6 ("ethtool: clarify the ethtool FEC interface"), but I am not sure if the addition of an entirely new ETHTOOL_FEC_AUTO_DIS would make any sense here. Is that a better explanation of the reasoning? Thanks, Jake
quoted
allow the use of FEC disabled if the media does not support FEC disabled. However users may want to override this behavior. To support this, accept the ETHTOOL_FEC_AUTO | ETHTOOL_FEC_OFF as arequestquoted
to automatically select an appropriate FEC mode including potentially disabling FEC. This is distinct from ETHTOOL_FEC_AUTO because that will not allow the LESM to select FEC disabled. It is distinct from ETHTOOL_FEC_OFF because FEC_OFF will always disable FEC without any LESM automatic selection. This *does* mean that ice is now accepting one "bitwise OR" set for FEC configuration, which is somewhat against the recommendations made in 6dbf94b264e6 ("ethtool: clarify the ethtool FEC interface"), but I am not sure if the addition of an entirely new ETHTOOL_FEC_AUTO_DIS would makeanyquoted
sense here. With this change, users can opt to allow automatic FEC disable via ethtool --set-fec ethX encoding auto off