Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

Subsystems: memory management, the rest, vmalloc

8 messages, 2 authors, 2022-03-29 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2022-03-26 00:07:47

On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 10:57 -0800, Song Liu wrote:
From: Song Liu <redacted>

This enables module_alloc() to allocate huge page for 2MB+ requests.
To check the difference of this change, we need enable config
CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS, and call module_alloc(2MB). Before the change,
/sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/kernel shows pte for this map. With the
change, /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/ show pmd for thie map.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <redacted>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Hi,

I just saw this upstream today. Glad to see this functionality, but I
think turning on huge vmalloc pages for x86 needs a bit more. I’ll
describe a couple possible failure modes I haven’t actually tested.

One problem is that the direct map permission reset part in vmalloc
assumes any special permissioned pages are mapped 4k on the direct map.
Otherwise the operation could fail to reset a page RW if a PTE page
allocation fails when it tries to split the page to toggle a 4k sized
region NP/P. If you are not familiar, x86 CPA generally leaves the
direct map page sizes mirroring the primary alias (vmalloc). So once
vmalloc has huge pages, the special permissioned direct map aliases
will have them too. This limitation of HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC is
actually hinted about in the Kconfig comments, but I guess it wasn’t
specific that x86 has these properties.

I think to make the vmalloc resetting part safe:
1. set_direct_map_invalid/default() needs to support multiple pages
like this[0].
2. vm_remove_mappings() needs to call them with the correct page size
in the hpage case so they don't cause a split[1].
3. Then hibernate needs to be blocked during this operation so it
doesn’t encounter the now sometimes huge NP pages, which it can’t
handle. Not sure what the right way to do this is, but potentially like
in the diff below[1].

Another problem is that CPA will sometimes now split pages of vmalloc
mappings in cases where it sets a region of an allocation to a
different permission than the rest (for example regular modules calling
set_memory_x() on the text section). Before this change, these couldn’t
fail since the module space mapping would never require a split.
Modules doesn’t check for failure there, so I’m thinking now it would
proceed to try to execute NX memory if the split failed. It could only
happen on allocation of especially large modules. Maybe it should just
be avoided for now by having regular module allocations pass
VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP on x86. And BPF could call __vmalloc_node_range()
directly to get 2MB vmallocs.

[0] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208084920.2884-5-rppt@kernel.org/#t

[1] Untested, but something like this possibly:
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 99e0f3e8d1a5..97c4ca3a29b1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/shmparam.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "pgalloc-track.h"
@@ -2241,7 +2242,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_map_ram);
 
 static struct vm_struct *vmlist __initdata;
 
-static inline unsigned int vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm)
+static inline unsigned int vm_area_page_order(const struct vm_struct
*vm)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
        return vm->page_order;
@@ -2560,12 +2561,12 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void
*addr)
 static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
                                       int (*set_direct_map)(struct
page *page))
 {
+       unsigned int page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
        int i;
 
-       /* HUGE_VMALLOC passes small pages to set_direct_map */
-       for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++)
+       for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i += 1U << page_order)
                if (page_address(area->pages[i]))
-                       set_direct_map(area->pages[i]);
+                       set_direct_map(area->pages[i], 1U <<
page_order);
 }
 
 /* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the vm_struct.
*/
@@ -2592,6 +2593,10 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct
*area, int deallocate_pages)
                return;
        }
 
+       /* Hibernate can't handle large NP pages */
+       if (page_order)
+               lock_system_sleep();
+
        /*
         * If execution gets here, flush the vm mapping and reset the
direct
         * map. Find the start and end range of the direct mappings to
make sure
@@ -2617,6 +2622,9 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct
*area, int deallocate_pages)
        set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_invalid_noflush);
        _vm_unmap_aliases(start, end, flush_dmap);
        set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_default_noflush);
+
+       if (page_order)
+               unlock_system_sleep();
 }
 
 static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-28 23:27:22

+Paul
On Mar 25, 2022, at 5:06 PM, Edgecombe, Rick P [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 10:57 -0800, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
From: Song Liu <redacted>

This enables module_alloc() to allocate huge page for 2MB+ requests.
To check the difference of this change, we need enable config
CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS, and call module_alloc(2MB). Before the change,
/sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/kernel shows pte for this map. With the
change, /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/ show pmd for thie map.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <redacted>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Hi,

I just saw this upstream today. Glad to see this functionality, but I
think turning on huge vmalloc pages for x86 needs a bit more. I’ll
describe a couple possible failure modes I haven’t actually tested.

One problem is that the direct map permission reset part in vmalloc
assumes any special permissioned pages are mapped 4k on the direct map.
Otherwise the operation could fail to reset a page RW if a PTE page
allocation fails when it tries to split the page to toggle a 4k sized
region NP/P. If you are not familiar, x86 CPA generally leaves the
direct map page sizes mirroring the primary alias (vmalloc). So once
vmalloc has huge pages, the special permissioned direct map aliases
will have them too. This limitation of HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC is
actually hinted about in the Kconfig comments, but I guess it wasn’t
specific that x86 has these properties.

I think to make the vmalloc resetting part safe:
1. set_direct_map_invalid/default() needs to support multiple pages
like this[0].
2. vm_remove_mappings() needs to call them with the correct page size
in the hpage case so they don't cause a split[1].
3. Then hibernate needs to be blocked during this operation so it
doesn’t encounter the now sometimes huge NP pages, which it can’t
handle. Not sure what the right way to do this is, but potentially like
in the diff below[1].

Another problem is that CPA will sometimes now split pages of vmalloc
mappings in cases where it sets a region of an allocation to a
different permission than the rest (for example regular modules calling
set_memory_x() on the text section). Before this change, these couldn’t
fail since the module space mapping would never require a split.
Modules doesn’t check for failure there, so I’m thinking now it would
proceed to try to execute NX memory if the split failed. It could only
happen on allocation of especially large modules. Maybe it should just
be avoided for now by having regular module allocations pass
VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP on x86. And BPF could call __vmalloc_node_range()
directly to get 2MB vmallocs.
I like this direction. But I am afraid this is not enough. Using
VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP in module_alloc() will make sure we don't allocate 
huge pages for modules. But other users of __vmalloc_node_range(), 
such as vzalloc in Paul's report, may still hit the issue. 

Maybe we need another flag VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP that bypasses 
vmap_allow_huge check. Something like the diff below.

Would this work?

Thanks,
Song


diff --git i/include/linux/vmalloc.h w/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 3b1df7da402d..a639405dab99 100644
--- i/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ w/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct notifier_block;                /* in notifier.h */
 #define VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS   0x00000100      /* reset direct map and flush TLB on unmap, can't be freed in atomic context */
 #define VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES       0x00000200      /* put pages and free array in vfree */
 #define VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP                0x00000400      /* force PAGE_SIZE pte mapping */
+#define VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP     0x00000800      /* force PMD_SIZE mapping (bypass vmap_allow_huge check) */

 #if (defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)) && \
        !defined(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC)
diff --git i/kernel/bpf/core.c w/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 13e9dbeeedf3..3cd0ff66d39c 100644
--- i/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ w/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -851,13 +851,22 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pack_list);
 #define BPF_HPAGE_MASK PAGE_MASK
 #endif

+static void *bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(unsigned long size)
+{
+       return __vmalloc_node_range(size, MODULE_ALIGN,
+                                   MODULES_VADDR + get_module_load_offset(),
+                                   MODULES_END, gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL,
+                                   VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK | VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP,
+                                   NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
+}
+
 static size_t select_bpf_prog_pack_size(void)
 {
        size_t size;
        void *ptr;

        size = BPF_HPAGE_SIZE * num_online_nodes();
-       ptr = module_alloc(size);
+       ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(size);

        /* Test whether we can get huge pages. If not just use PAGE_SIZE
         * packs.
@@ -881,7 +890,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog_pack *alloc_new_pack(void)
                       GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!pack)
                return NULL;
-       pack->ptr = module_alloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
+       pack->ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
        if (!pack->ptr) {
                kfree(pack);
                return NULL;
diff --git i/mm/vmalloc.c w/mm/vmalloc.c
index e163372d3967..df2dd6779fa8 100644
--- i/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ w/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -3106,7 +3106,8 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
                return NULL;
        }

-       if (vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) {
+       if ((vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) ||
+           (vm_flags & VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP)) {
                unsigned long size_per_node;

                /*


quoted hunk
[0] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208084920.2884-5-rppt@kernel.org/#t

[1] Untested, but something like this possibly:
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 99e0f3e8d1a5..97c4ca3a29b1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include <asm/shmparam.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>

#include "internal.h"
#include "pgalloc-track.h"
@@ -2241,7 +2242,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_map_ram);
static struct vm_struct *vmlist __initdata;

-static inline unsigned int vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm)
+static inline unsigned int vm_area_page_order(const struct vm_struct
*vm)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
       return vm->page_order;
@@ -2560,12 +2561,12 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void
*addr)
static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
                                      int (*set_direct_map)(struct
page *page))
{
+       unsigned int page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
       int i;

-       /* HUGE_VMALLOC passes small pages to set_direct_map */
-       for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++)
+       for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i += 1U << page_order)
               if (page_address(area->pages[i]))
-                       set_direct_map(area->pages[i]);
+                       set_direct_map(area->pages[i], 1U <<
page_order);
}

/* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the vm_struct.
*/
@@ -2592,6 +2593,10 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct
*area, int deallocate_pages)
               return;
       }

+       /* Hibernate can't handle large NP pages */
+       if (page_order)
+               lock_system_sleep();
+
       /*
        * If execution gets here, flush the vm mapping and reset the
direct
        * map. Find the start and end range of the direct mappings to
make sure
@@ -2617,6 +2622,9 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct
*area, int deallocate_pages)
       set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_invalid_noflush);
       _vm_unmap_aliases(start, end, flush_dmap);
       set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_default_noflush);
+
+       if (page_order)
+               unlock_system_sleep();
}

static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2022-03-29 00:18:27

On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 23:27 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
I like this direction. But I am afraid this is not enough. Using
VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP in module_alloc() will make sure we don't allocate 
huge pages for modules. But other users of __vmalloc_node_range(), 
such as vzalloc in Paul's report, may still hit the issue. 

Maybe we need another flag VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP that bypasses 
vmap_allow_huge check. Something like the diff below.

Would this work?
Yea, that looks like a safer direction. It's too bad we can't have
automatic large pages, but it doesn't seem ready to just turn on for
the whole x86 kernel.

I'm not sure about this implementation though. It would let large pages
get enabled without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC and also despite the disable
kernel parameter.

Apparently some architectures can handle large pages automatically and
it has benefits for them, so maybe vmalloc should support both
behaviors based on config. Like there should a
ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_REQUIRE_FLAG config. If configured it requires
VM_HUGE_VMAP (or some name). I don't think FORCE fits, because the
current logic would not always give huge pages.

But yea, seems risky to leave it on generally, even if you could fix
Paul's specific issue.

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-29 08:24:07

On Mar 28, 2022, at 5:18 PM, Edgecombe, Rick P [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 23:27 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
I like this direction. But I am afraid this is not enough. Using
VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP in module_alloc() will make sure we don't allocate 
huge pages for modules. But other users of __vmalloc_node_range(), 
such as vzalloc in Paul's report, may still hit the issue. 

Maybe we need another flag VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP that bypasses 
vmap_allow_huge check. Something like the diff below.

Would this work?
Yea, that looks like a safer direction. It's too bad we can't have
automatic large pages, but it doesn't seem ready to just turn on for
the whole x86 kernel.

I'm not sure about this implementation though. It would let large pages
get enabled without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC and also despite the disable
kernel parameter.

Apparently some architectures can handle large pages automatically and
it has benefits for them, so maybe vmalloc should support both
behaviors based on config. Like there should a
ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_REQUIRE_FLAG config. If configured it requires
VM_HUGE_VMAP (or some name). I don't think FORCE fits, because the
current logic would not always give huge pages.

But yea, seems risky to leave it on generally, even if you could fix
Paul's specific issue.

How about something like the following? (I still need to fix something, but
would like some feedbacks on the API).

Thanks,
Song

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 84bc1de02720..defef50ff527 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -858,6 +858,15 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
 	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 	bool
 
+#
+# HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG allows users of __vmalloc_node_range to allocate
+# huge page without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC. To allocate huge pages,, the user
+# need to call __vmalloc_node_range with VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP.
+#
+config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
+	bool
+
 config ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
 	bool
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 7340d9f01b62..e64f00415575 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ config X86
 	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE		if SLUB
 	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP		if X86_64 || X86_PAE
-	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC		if X86_64
+	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG	if X86_64
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
 	select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN			if X86_64
diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 3b1df7da402d..98f8a93fcfd4 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct notifier_block;		/* in notifier.h */
 #define VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK	0
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+#define VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP	0x00001000	/* prefer PMD_SIZE mapping (bypass vmap_allow_huge check) */
+#else
+#define VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP	0
+#endif
 /* bits [20..32] reserved for arch specific ioremap internals */
 
 /*
@@ -51,7 +56,7 @@ struct vm_struct {
 	unsigned long		size;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	struct page		**pages;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	unsigned int		page_order;
 #endif
 	unsigned int		nr_pages;
@@ -225,7 +230,7 @@ static inline bool is_vm_area_hugepages(const void *addr)
 	 * prevents that. This only indicates the size of the physical page
 	 * allocated in the vmalloc layer.
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	return find_vm_area(addr)->page_order > 0;
 #else
 	return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 13e9dbeeedf3..fc9dae095079 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -851,13 +851,28 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pack_list);
 #define BPF_HPAGE_MASK PAGE_MASK
 #endif
 
+static void *bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(unsigned long size)
+{
+#if defined(MODULES_VADDR)
+	unsigned long start = MODULES_VADDR;
+	unsigned long end = MODULES_END;
+#else
+	unsigned long start = VMALLOC_START;
+	unsigned long end = VMALLOC_END;
+#endif
+
+	return __vmalloc_node_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, start, end, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL,
+				    VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK | VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP,
+				    NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
+}
+
 static size_t select_bpf_prog_pack_size(void)
 {
 	size_t size;
 	void *ptr;
 
 	size = BPF_HPAGE_SIZE * num_online_nodes();
-	ptr = module_alloc(size);
+	ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(size);
 
 	/* Test whether we can get huge pages. If not just use PAGE_SIZE
 	 * packs.
@@ -881,7 +896,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog_pack *alloc_new_pack(void)
 		       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pack)
 		return NULL;
-	pack->ptr = module_alloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
+	pack->ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
 	if (!pack->ptr) {
 		kfree(pack);
 		return NULL;
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index e163372d3967..9d3c1ab8bdf1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ static inline unsigned int vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm)
 
 static inline void set_vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm, unsigned int order)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	vm->page_order = order;
 #else
 	BUG_ON(order != 0);
@@ -3106,7 +3106,8 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) {
+	if ((vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) ||
+	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG) && (vm_flags & VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP))) {
 		unsigned long size_per_node;
 
 		/*

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2022-03-29 18:40:00

CC some vmalloc folks. What happened was vmalloc huge pages was turned
on for x86 with the rest of the kernel unprepared and problems have
popped up. We are discussing a possible new config and vmap flag such
that for some arch's, huge pages would only be used for certain
allocations such as BPF's.

Thread:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6080EC28-E3FE-4B00-B94A-ED7EBA1F55ED@fb.com/

On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 08:23 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
quoted hunk
quoted
On Mar 28, 2022, at 5:18 PM, Edgecombe, Rick P <
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> wrote:

On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 23:27 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
I like this direction. But I am afraid this is not enough. Using
VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP in module_alloc() will make sure we don't
allocate 
huge pages for modules. But other users of
__vmalloc_node_range(), 
such as vzalloc in Paul's report, may still hit the issue. 

Maybe we need another flag VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP that bypasses 
vmap_allow_huge check. Something like the diff below.

Would this work?
Yea, that looks like a safer direction. It's too bad we can't have
automatic large pages, but it doesn't seem ready to just turn on
for
the whole x86 kernel.

I'm not sure about this implementation though. It would let large
pages
get enabled without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC and also despite the
disable
kernel parameter.

Apparently some architectures can handle large pages automatically
and
it has benefits for them, so maybe vmalloc should support both
behaviors based on config. Like there should a
ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_REQUIRE_FLAG config. If configured it requires
VM_HUGE_VMAP (or some name). I don't think FORCE fits, because the
current logic would not always give huge pages.

But yea, seems risky to leave it on generally, even if you could
fix
Paul's specific issue.

How about something like the following? (I still need to fix
something, but
would like some feedbacks on the API).

Thanks,
Song

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 84bc1de02720..defef50ff527 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -858,6 +858,15 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
 	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 	bool
 
+#
+# HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG allows users of __vmalloc_node_range
to allocate
+# huge page without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC. To allocate huge pages,,
the user
+# need to call __vmalloc_node_range with VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP.
+#
+config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
+	bool
+
 config ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
 	bool
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 7340d9f01b62..e64f00415575 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ config X86
 	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE		if SLUB
 	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP		if X86_64 || X86_PAE
-	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC		if X86_64
+	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG	if X86_64
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
 	select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN			if X86_64
diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 3b1df7da402d..98f8a93fcfd4 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct notifier_block;		/* in
notifier.h */
 #define VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK	0
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+#define VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP	0x00001000	/* prefer PMD_SIZE
mapping (bypass vmap_allow_huge check) */
I don't think we should tie this to vmap_allow_huge by definition.
Also, what it does is try 2MB pages for allocations larger than 2MB.
For smaller allocations it doesn't try or "prefer" them.
quoted hunk
+#else
+#define VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP	0
+#endif
 /* bits [20..32] reserved for arch specific ioremap internals */
 
 /*
@@ -51,7 +56,7 @@ struct vm_struct {
 	unsigned long		size;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	struct page		**pages;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	unsigned int		page_order;
 #endif
 	unsigned int		nr_pages;
@@ -225,7 +230,7 @@ static inline bool is_vm_area_hugepages(const
void *addr)
 	 * prevents that. This only indicates the size of the physical
page
 	 * allocated in the vmalloc layer.
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	return find_vm_area(addr)->page_order > 0;
 #else
 	return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 13e9dbeeedf3..fc9dae095079 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -851,13 +851,28 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pack_list);
 #define BPF_HPAGE_MASK PAGE_MASK
 #endif
 
+static void *bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(unsigned long size)
+{
+#if defined(MODULES_VADDR)
+	unsigned long start = MODULES_VADDR;
+	unsigned long end = MODULES_END;
+#else
+	unsigned long start = VMALLOC_START;
+	unsigned long end = VMALLOC_END;
+#endif
+
+	return __vmalloc_node_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, start, end,
GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL,
+				    VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK |
VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP,
+				    NUMA_NO_NODE,
__builtin_return_address(0));
+}
+
 static size_t select_bpf_prog_pack_size(void)
 {
 	size_t size;
 	void *ptr;
 
 	size = BPF_HPAGE_SIZE * num_online_nodes();
-	ptr = module_alloc(size);
+	ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(size);
 
 	/* Test whether we can get huge pages. If not just use
PAGE_SIZE
 	 * packs.
@@ -881,7 +896,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog_pack *alloc_new_pack(void)
 		       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pack)
 		return NULL;
-	pack->ptr = module_alloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
+	pack->ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
 	if (!pack->ptr) {
 		kfree(pack);
 		return NULL;
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index e163372d3967..9d3c1ab8bdf1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ static inline unsigned int
vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm)
 
 static inline void set_vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm,
unsigned int order)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	vm->page_order = order;
 #else
 	BUG_ON(order != 0);
@@ -3106,7 +3106,8 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size,
unsigned long align,
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) {
+	if ((vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) ||
+	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG) &&
(vm_flags & VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP))) {
vmap_allow_huge is how the kernel parameter that can disable vmalloc
huge pages works. I don't think we should separate it. Disabling
vmalloc huge pages should still disable this alternate mode.
 		unsigned long size_per_node;
 
 		/*

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-29 19:13:42

On Mar 29, 2022, at 11:39 AM, Edgecombe, Rick P [off-list ref] wrote:

CC some vmalloc folks. What happened was vmalloc huge pages was turned
on for x86 with the rest of the kernel unprepared and problems have
popped up. We are discussing a possible new config and vmap flag such
that for some arch's, huge pages would only be used for certain
allocations such as BPF's.

Thread:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6080EC28-E3FE-4B00-B94A-ED7EBA1F55ED@fb.com/

On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 08:23 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
quoted
On Mar 28, 2022, at 5:18 PM, Edgecombe, Rick P <
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> wrote:

On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 23:27 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
I like this direction. But I am afraid this is not enough. Using
VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP in module_alloc() will make sure we don't
allocate 
huge pages for modules. But other users of
__vmalloc_node_range(), 
such as vzalloc in Paul's report, may still hit the issue. 

Maybe we need another flag VM_FORCE_HUGE_VMAP that bypasses 
vmap_allow_huge check. Something like the diff below.

Would this work?
Yea, that looks like a safer direction. It's too bad we can't have
automatic large pages, but it doesn't seem ready to just turn on
for
the whole x86 kernel.

I'm not sure about this implementation though. It would let large
pages
get enabled without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC and also despite the
disable
kernel parameter.

Apparently some architectures can handle large pages automatically
and
it has benefits for them, so maybe vmalloc should support both
behaviors based on config. Like there should a
ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_REQUIRE_FLAG config. If configured it requires
VM_HUGE_VMAP (or some name). I don't think FORCE fits, because the
current logic would not always give huge pages.

But yea, seems risky to leave it on generally, even if you could
fix
Paul's specific issue.

How about something like the following? (I still need to fix
something, but
would like some feedbacks on the API).

Thanks,
Song

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 84bc1de02720..defef50ff527 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -858,6 +858,15 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
	bool

+#
+# HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG allows users of __vmalloc_node_range
to allocate
+# huge page without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC. To allocate huge pages,,
the user
+# need to call __vmalloc_node_range with VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP.
+#
+config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
+	bool
+
config ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
	bool
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 7340d9f01b62..e64f00415575 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ config X86
	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE		if SLUB
	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP		if X86_64 || X86_PAE
-	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC		if X86_64
+	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG	if X86_64
	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
	select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN			if X86_64
diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 3b1df7da402d..98f8a93fcfd4 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct notifier_block;		/* in
notifier.h */
#define VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK	0
#endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+#define VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP	0x00001000	/* prefer PMD_SIZE
mapping (bypass vmap_allow_huge check) */
I don't think we should tie this to vmap_allow_huge by definition.
Also, what it does is try 2MB pages for allocations larger than 2MB.
For smaller allocations it doesn't try or "prefer" them.
How about something like:

#define VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP        0x00001000      /* try PMD_SIZE mapping if size-per-node >= PMD_SIZE */
quoted
+#else
+#define VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP	0
+#endif
/* bits [20..32] reserved for arch specific ioremap internals */

/*
@@ -51,7 +56,7 @@ struct vm_struct {
	unsigned long		size;
	unsigned long		flags;
	struct page		**pages;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
	unsigned int		page_order;
#endif
	unsigned int		nr_pages;
@@ -225,7 +230,7 @@ static inline bool is_vm_area_hugepages(const
void *addr)
	 * prevents that. This only indicates the size of the physical
page
	 * allocated in the vmalloc layer.
	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
	return find_vm_area(addr)->page_order > 0;
#else
	return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 13e9dbeeedf3..fc9dae095079 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -851,13 +851,28 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pack_list);
#define BPF_HPAGE_MASK PAGE_MASK
#endif

+static void *bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(unsigned long size)
+{
+#if defined(MODULES_VADDR)
+	unsigned long start = MODULES_VADDR;
+	unsigned long end = MODULES_END;
+#else
+	unsigned long start = VMALLOC_START;
+	unsigned long end = VMALLOC_END;
+#endif
+
+	return __vmalloc_node_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, start, end,
GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL,
+				    VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK |
VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP,
+				    NUMA_NO_NODE,
__builtin_return_address(0));
+}
+
static size_t select_bpf_prog_pack_size(void)
{
	size_t size;
	void *ptr;

	size = BPF_HPAGE_SIZE * num_online_nodes();
-	ptr = module_alloc(size);
+	ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(size);

	/* Test whether we can get huge pages. If not just use
PAGE_SIZE
	 * packs.
@@ -881,7 +896,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog_pack *alloc_new_pack(void)
		       GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!pack)
		return NULL;
-	pack->ptr = module_alloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
+	pack->ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
	if (!pack->ptr) {
		kfree(pack);
		return NULL;
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index e163372d3967..9d3c1ab8bdf1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ static inline unsigned int
vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm)

static inline void set_vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm,
unsigned int order)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
	vm->page_order = order;
#else
	BUG_ON(order != 0);
@@ -3106,7 +3106,8 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size,
unsigned long align,
		return NULL;
	}

-	if (vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) {
+	if ((vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) ||
+	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG) &&
(vm_flags & VM_PREFER_HUGE_VMAP))) {
vmap_allow_huge is how the kernel parameter that can disable vmalloc
huge pages works. I don't think we should separate it. Disabling
vmalloc huge pages should still disable this alternate mode.
Yeah, this makes sense. I will fix it. 
quoted
		unsigned long size_per_node;

		/*

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2022-03-29 21:36:18

On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 19:13 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
I don't think we should tie this to vmap_allow_huge by definition.
Also, what it does is try 2MB pages for allocations larger than
2MB.
For smaller allocations it doesn't try or "prefer" them.
How about something like:

#define VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP        0x00001000      /* try PMD_SIZE
mapping if size-per-node >= PMD_SIZE */
Seems reasonable name. I don't know if "size-per-node >= PMD_SIZE" is
going to be useful information. Maybe something like:

/* Allow for huge pages on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG arch's */

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 1/9] x86/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP

From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-29 22:12:09

On Mar 29, 2022, at 2:36 PM, Edgecombe, Rick P [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 19:13 +0000, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
quoted
I don't think we should tie this to vmap_allow_huge by definition.
Also, what it does is try 2MB pages for allocations larger than
2MB.
For smaller allocations it doesn't try or "prefer" them.
How about something like:

#define VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP        0x00001000      /* try PMD_SIZE
mapping if size-per-node >= PMD_SIZE */
Seems reasonable name. I don't know if "size-per-node >= PMD_SIZE" is
going to be useful information. Maybe something like:

/* Allow for huge pages on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG arch's */
Sounds great. I updated the version based on this (below). I will split it
into two patches, I guess. 

@Paul, could you please test whether this version fixes the issue you were
seeing?

Thanks,
Song


diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 84bc1de02720..0fb2bd5fd1f8 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -858,6 +858,15 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
 	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 	bool
 
+#
+# HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG allows users of __vmalloc_node_range to allocate
+# huge page without HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC. To allocate huge pages, the user
+# need to call __vmalloc_node_range with VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP.
+#
+config HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+	depends on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
+	bool
+
 config ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
 	bool
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 7340d9f01b62..e64f00415575 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ config FORCE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
 	 in order to test the non static function tracing in the
 	 generic code, as other architectures still use it. But we
 	 only need to keep it around for x86_64. No need to keep it
-	 for x86_32. For x86_32, force DYNAMIC_FTRACE. 
+	 for x86_32. For x86_32, force DYNAMIC_FTRACE.
 #
 # Arch settings
 #
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ config X86
 	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE		if SLUB
 	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP		if X86_64 || X86_PAE
-	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC		if X86_64
+	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG	if X86_64
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
 	select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN			if X86_64
diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 3b1df7da402d..a48d0690b66f 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct notifier_block;		/* in notifier.h */
 #define VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK	0
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG
+#define VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP	0x00001000	/* Allow for huge pages on HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG arch's */
+#else
+#define VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP	0
+#endif
 /* bits [20..32] reserved for arch specific ioremap internals */
 
 /*
@@ -51,7 +56,7 @@ struct vm_struct {
 	unsigned long		size;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	struct page		**pages;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	unsigned int		page_order;
 #endif
 	unsigned int		nr_pages;
@@ -225,7 +230,7 @@ static inline bool is_vm_area_hugepages(const void *addr)
 	 * prevents that. This only indicates the size of the physical page
 	 * allocated in the vmalloc layer.
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	return find_vm_area(addr)->page_order > 0;
 #else
 	return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 13e9dbeeedf3..5659677b18f3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -851,13 +851,28 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pack_list);
 #define BPF_HPAGE_MASK PAGE_MASK
 #endif
 
+static void *bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(unsigned long size)
+{
+#if defined(MODULES_VADDR)
+	unsigned long start = MODULES_VADDR;
+	unsigned long end = MODULES_END;
+#else
+	unsigned long start = VMALLOC_START;
+	unsigned long end = VMALLOC_END;
+#endif
+
+	return __vmalloc_node_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, start, end, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL,
+				    VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK | VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP,
+				    NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
+}
+
 static size_t select_bpf_prog_pack_size(void)
 {
 	size_t size;
 	void *ptr;
 
 	size = BPF_HPAGE_SIZE * num_online_nodes();
-	ptr = module_alloc(size);
+	ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(size);
 
 	/* Test whether we can get huge pages. If not just use PAGE_SIZE
 	 * packs.
@@ -881,7 +896,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog_pack *alloc_new_pack(void)
 		       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pack)
 		return NULL;
-	pack->ptr = module_alloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
+	pack->ptr = bpf_prog_pack_vmalloc(bpf_prog_pack_size);
 	if (!pack->ptr) {
 		kfree(pack);
 		return NULL;
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index e163372d3967..179200bce285 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "pgalloc-track.h"
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 static unsigned int __ro_after_init ioremap_max_page_shift = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
 
 static int __init set_nohugeiomap(char *str)
@@ -55,11 +55,11 @@ static int __init set_nohugeiomap(char *str)
 	return 0;
 }
 early_param("nohugeiomap", set_nohugeiomap);
-#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP || CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG */
 static const unsigned int ioremap_max_page_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
-#endif	/* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+#endif	/* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP || CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG*/
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 static bool __ro_after_init vmap_allow_huge = true;
 
 static int __init set_nohugevmalloc(char *str)
@@ -582,8 +582,9 @@ int vmap_pages_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 
 	WARN_ON(page_shift < PAGE_SHIFT);
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
-			page_shift == PAGE_SHIFT)
+	if ((!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) &&
+	     !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG)) ||
+	    (page_shift == PAGE_SHIFT))
 		return vmap_small_pages_range_noflush(addr, end, prot, pages);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr; i += 1U << (page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT)) {
@@ -2252,7 +2253,7 @@ static struct vm_struct *vmlist __initdata;
 
 static inline unsigned int vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	return vm->page_order;
 #else
 	return 0;
@@ -2261,7 +2262,7 @@ static inline unsigned int vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm)
 
 static inline void set_vm_area_page_order(struct vm_struct *vm, unsigned int order)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC
+#if (defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG))
 	vm->page_order = order;
 #else
 	BUG_ON(order != 0);
@@ -3056,6 +3057,15 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static bool vmalloc_try_huge_page(unsigned long vm_flags)
+{
+	if (!vmap_allow_huge || (vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP))
+		return false;
+
+	/* VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP only works for CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG */
+	return vm_flags & VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP;
+}
+
 /**
  * __vmalloc_node_range - allocate virtually contiguous memory
  * @size:		  allocation size
@@ -3106,7 +3116,7 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (vmap_allow_huge && !(vm_flags & VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP)) {
+	if (vmalloc_try_huge_page(vm_flags)) {
 		unsigned long size_per_node;
 
 		/*
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help