From: Matthias-Christian Ott <hidden> Date: 2021-12-26 13:29:44
The D-Link DSB-650TX (2001:4002) is unable to receive Ethernet frames
that are longer than 1518 octets, for example, Ethernet frames that
contain 802.1Q VLAN tags.
The frames are sent to the pegasus driver via USB but the driver
discards them because they have the Long_pkt field set to 1 in the
received status report. The function read_bulk_callback of the pegasus
driver treats such received "packets" (in the terminology of the
hardware) as errors but the field simply does just indicate that the
Ethernet frame (MAC destination to FCS) is longer than 1518 octets.
It seems that in the 1990s there was a distinction between
"giant" (> 1518) and "runt" (< 64) frames and the hardware includes
flags to indicate this distinction. It seems that the purpose of the
distinction "giant" frames was to not allow infinitely long frames due
to transmission errors and to allow hardware to have an upper limit of
the frame size. However, the hardware already has such limit with its
2048 octet receive buffer and, therefore, Long_pkt is merely a
convention and should not be treated as a receive error.
Actually, the hardware is even able to receive Ethernet frames with 2048
octets which exceeds the claimed limit frame size limit of the driver of
1536 octets (PEGASUS_MTU).
Signed-off-by: Matthias-Christian Ott <redacted>
---
drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -499,11 +499,11 @@ static void read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)gotogoon;rx_status=buf[count-2];-if(rx_status&0x1e){+if(rx_status&0x1c){netif_dbg(pegasus,rx_err,net,"RX packet error %x\n",rx_status);net->stats.rx_errors++;-if(rx_status&0x06)/* long or runt */+if(rx_status&0x04)/* runt */net->stats.rx_length_errors++;if(rx_status&0x08)net->stats.rx_crc_errors++;
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Date: 2021-12-26 15:40:44
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 02:29:30PM +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
quoted hunk
The D-Link DSB-650TX (2001:4002) is unable to receive Ethernet frames
that are longer than 1518 octets, for example, Ethernet frames that
contain 802.1Q VLAN tags.
The frames are sent to the pegasus driver via USB but the driver
discards them because they have the Long_pkt field set to 1 in the
received status report. The function read_bulk_callback of the pegasus
driver treats such received "packets" (in the terminology of the
hardware) as errors but the field simply does just indicate that the
Ethernet frame (MAC destination to FCS) is longer than 1518 octets.
It seems that in the 1990s there was a distinction between
"giant" (> 1518) and "runt" (< 64) frames and the hardware includes
flags to indicate this distinction. It seems that the purpose of the
distinction "giant" frames was to not allow infinitely long frames due
to transmission errors and to allow hardware to have an upper limit of
the frame size. However, the hardware already has such limit with its
2048 octet receive buffer and, therefore, Long_pkt is merely a
convention and should not be treated as a receive error.
Actually, the hardware is even able to receive Ethernet frames with 2048
octets which exceeds the claimed limit frame size limit of the driver of
1536 octets (PEGASUS_MTU).
Signed-off-by: Matthias-Christian Ott <redacted>
---
drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -499,11 +499,11 @@ static void read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)gotogoon;rx_status=buf[count-2];-if(rx_status&0x1e){+if(rx_status&0x1c){netif_dbg(pegasus,rx_err,net,"RX packet error %x\n",rx_status);net->stats.rx_errors++;-if(rx_status&0x06)/* long or runt */+if(rx_status&0x04)/* runt */
I've nothing against this patch, but if you are working on the driver,
it would be nice to replace these hex numbers with #defines using BIT,
or FIELD. It will make the code more readable.
Andrew
From: Matthias-Christian Ott <hidden> Date: 2021-12-26 16:01:31
On 26/12/2021 16:39, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 02:29:30PM +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
quoted
The D-Link DSB-650TX (2001:4002) is unable to receive Ethernet frames
that are longer than 1518 octets, for example, Ethernet frames that
contain 802.1Q VLAN tags.
The frames are sent to the pegasus driver via USB but the driver
discards them because they have the Long_pkt field set to 1 in the
received status report. The function read_bulk_callback of the pegasus
driver treats such received "packets" (in the terminology of the
hardware) as errors but the field simply does just indicate that the
Ethernet frame (MAC destination to FCS) is longer than 1518 octets.
It seems that in the 1990s there was a distinction between
"giant" (> 1518) and "runt" (< 64) frames and the hardware includes
flags to indicate this distinction. It seems that the purpose of the
distinction "giant" frames was to not allow infinitely long frames due
to transmission errors and to allow hardware to have an upper limit of
the frame size. However, the hardware already has such limit with its
2048 octet receive buffer and, therefore, Long_pkt is merely a
convention and should not be treated as a receive error.
Actually, the hardware is even able to receive Ethernet frames with 2048
octets which exceeds the claimed limit frame size limit of the driver of
1536 octets (PEGASUS_MTU).
Signed-off-by: Matthias-Christian Ott <redacted>
---
drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -499,11 +499,11 @@ static void read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)gotogoon;rx_status=buf[count-2];-if(rx_status&0x1e){+if(rx_status&0x1c){netif_dbg(pegasus,rx_err,net,"RX packet error %x\n",rx_status);net->stats.rx_errors++;-if(rx_status&0x06)/* long or runt */+if(rx_status&0x04)/* runt */
I've nothing against this patch, but if you are working on the driver,
it would be nice to replace these hex numbers with #defines using BIT,
or FIELD. It will make the code more readable.
Replacing the constants with macros is on my list of things that I want
to do. In this case, I did not do it because I wanted to a have small
patch that gets easily accepted and allows me to figure out the current
process to submit patches after years of inactivity.
Kind regards,
Matthias-Christian Ott
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Date: 2021-12-26 16:31:49
quoted
I've nothing against this patch, but if you are working on the driver,
it would be nice to replace these hex numbers with #defines using BIT,
or FIELD. It will make the code more readable.
Replacing the constants with macros is on my list of things that I want
to do. In this case, I did not do it because I wanted to a have small
patch that gets easily accepted and allows me to figure out the current
process to submit patches after years of inactivity.
Agreed, keep fixes simple.
A few other hints. If you consider this a fix which should be back
ported, please add a Fixes: tag, where the issue started. This can be
back as far as the first commit for the driver. Fixes should also be
sent to the net tree, not net-next. See the netdev FAQ about the two
different trees.
Andrew
From: Matthias-Christian Ott <hidden> Date: 2021-12-26 22:21:25
On 26/12/2021 17:31, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
I've nothing against this patch, but if you are working on the driver,
it would be nice to replace these hex numbers with #defines using BIT,
or FIELD. It will make the code more readable.
Replacing the constants with macros is on my list of things that I want
to do. In this case, I did not do it because I wanted to a have small
patch that gets easily accepted and allows me to figure out the current
process to submit patches after years of inactivity.
Agreed, keep fixes simple.
A few other hints. If you consider this a fix which should be back
ported, please add a Fixes: tag, where the issue started. This can be
back as far as the first commit for the driver. Fixes should also be
sent to the net tree, not net-next. See the netdev FAQ about the two
different trees.
I made a v2 of the patch and also added the prefix flag to indicate that
the patch is destined for the "next" tree. There is still something that
can be improved a about it, please let me know. Otherwise, I will also
resend the other patch that I sent for the driver to indicate that it is
destined for the "next" tree.
Kind regards,
Matthias-Christian Ott
On 21-12-26 17:01:24, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
On 26/12/2021 16:39, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 02:29:30PM +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
quoted
The D-Link DSB-650TX (2001:4002) is unable to receive Ethernet frames that
are longer than 1518 octets, for example, Ethernet frames that contain
802.1Q VLAN tags.
The frames are sent to the pegasus driver via USB but the driver discards
them because they have the Long_pkt field set to 1 in the received status
report. The function read_bulk_callback of the pegasus driver treats such
received "packets" (in the terminology of the hardware) as errors but the
field simply does just indicate that the Ethernet frame (MAC destination to
FCS) is longer than 1518 octets.
It seems that in the 1990s there was a distinction between "giant" (> 1518)
and "runt" (< 64) frames and the hardware includes flags to indicate this
distinction. It seems that the purpose of the distinction "giant" frames
was to not allow infinitely long frames due to transmission errors and to
allow hardware to have an upper limit of the frame size. However, the
hardware already has such limit with its 2048 octet receive buffer and,
therefore, Long_pkt is merely a convention and should not be treated as a
receive error.
Actually, the hardware is even able to receive Ethernet frames with 2048
octets which exceeds the claimed limit frame size limit of the driver of
1536 octets (PEGASUS_MTU).
Signed-off-by: Matthias-Christian Ott <redacted>
---
drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -499,11 +499,11 @@ static void read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)gotogoon;rx_status=buf[count-2];-if(rx_status&0x1e){+if(rx_status&0x1c){netif_dbg(pegasus,rx_err,net,"RX packet error %x\n",rx_status);net->stats.rx_errors++;-if(rx_status&0x06)/* long or runt */+if(rx_status&0x04)/* runt */
I've nothing against this patch, but if you are working on the driver, it
would be nice to replace these hex numbers with #defines using BIT, or
FIELD. It will make the code more readable.
Replacing the constants with macros is on my list of things that I want to do.
In this case, I did not do it because I wanted to a have small patch that gets
easily accepted and allows me to figure out the current process to submit
patches after years of inactivity.
To be honest, that's due to the fact the original code was submitted more than
20 years ago, when the driver acceptance criteria were a lot more relaxed than
they are now. Ideally, these constants should be replaced with human readable
macros, something which i never got around doing.
If you are in the mood, you could send two patch series, one that fixes the
constants and another that fixes the packet size bug. As is often the case, one
of them may get mainlined right away, while the other is being debated for a
while.
cheers,
Petko
From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden> Date: 2021-12-27 09:56:50
Hello!
On 26.12.2021 16:29, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
The D-Link DSB-650TX (2001:4002) is unable to receive Ethernet frames
that are longer than 1518 octets, for example, Ethernet frames that
contain 802.1Q VLAN tags.
The frames are sent to the pegasus driver via USB but the driver
discards them because they have the Long_pkt field set to 1 in the
received status report. The function read_bulk_callback of the pegasus
driver treats such received "packets" (in the terminology of the
hardware) as errors but the field simply does just indicate that the
Ethernet frame (MAC destination to FCS) is longer than 1518 octets.
It seems that in the 1990s there was a distinction between
"giant" (> 1518) and "runt" (< 64) frames and the hardware includes
flags to indicate this distinction. It seems that the purpose of the
distinction "giant" frames was to not allow infinitely long frames due
to transmission errors and to allow hardware to have an upper limit of
the frame size. However, the hardware already has such limit with its
2048 octet receive buffer and, therefore, Long_pkt is merely a
convention and should not be treated as a receive error.
Actually, the hardware is even able to receive Ethernet frames with 2048
octets which exceeds the claimed limit frame size limit of the driver of
^^^^^ ^^^^^
Too many limits. :-)
1536 octets (PEGASUS_MTU).
Signed-off-by: Matthias-Christian Ott <redacted>
From: Matthias-Christian Ott <hidden> Date: 2022-01-02 14:22:44
On 27/12/2021 10:56, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
quoted
Actually, the hardware is even able to receive Ethernet frames with 2048
octets which exceeds the claimed limit frame size limit of the driver of
^^^^^ ^^^^^
Too many limits. :-)
Thank you for pointing this out. Indeed, this sentence does make sense.
:) Unfortunately, the patch was already merged and it seems that I can't
change its commit message anymore. Nonetheless, thank you for reviewing it.
Kind regards,
Matthias-Christian Ott