Hi,
There are just two clean-up patches for BPF_LOG_KERNEL log level:
patch #1 fixes the possible extra newline for bpf_log() and removes
the unnecessary calculation and truncation, and patch #2 disallows
BPF_LOG_KERNEL log level for bpf_btf_load().
Comments are welcome.
Regards,
Tao
Change Log:
v4:
* rebased on bpf-next
* add Acked-by tags
v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg48992.html
* rebased on bpf-next
* address comments from Daniel Borkmann:
patch #1: add prefix "BPF: " instead of "BPF:" for error message
patch #2: remove uncessary parenthesis, keep the max buffer length
setting of btf verifier, and add Fixes tag.
v2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg48809.html
* rebased on bpf-next
* patch #1: add a trailing newline if needed (suggested by Martin)
* add patch #2
v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg48550.html
Hou Tao (2):
bpf: clean-up bpf_verifier_vlog() for BPF_LOG_KERNEL log level
bpf: disallow BPF_LOG_KERNEL log level for bpf(BPF_BTF_LOAD)
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 16 +++++++++-------
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
An extra newline will output for bpf_log() with BPF_LOG_KERNEL level
as shown below:
[ 52.095704] BPF:The function test_3 has 12 arguments. Too many.
[ 52.095704]
[ 52.096896] Error in parsing func ptr test_3 in struct bpf_dummy_ops
Now all bpf_log() are ended by newline, but not all btf_verifier_log()
are ended by newline, so checking whether or not the log message
has the trailing newline and adding a newline if not.
Also there is no need to calculate the left userspace buffer size
for kernel log output and to truncate the output by '\0' which
has already been done by vscnprintf(), so only do these for
userspace log output.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <redacted>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <redacted>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
BPF_LOG_KERNEL is only used internally, so disallow bpf_btf_load()
to set log level as BPF_LOG_KERNEL. The same checking has already
been done in bpf_check(), so factor out a helper to check the
validity of log attributes and use it in both places.
Fixes: 8580ac9404f6 ("bpf: Process in-kernel BTF")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <redacted>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <redacted>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -13969,11 +13969,11 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)log->ubuf=(char__user*)(unsignedlong)attr->log_buf;log->len_total=attr->log_size;-ret=-EINVAL;/* log attributes have to be sane */-if(log->len_total<128||log->len_total>UINT_MAX>>2||-!log->level||!log->ubuf||log->level&~BPF_LOG_MASK)+if(!bpf_verifier_log_attr_valid(log,UINT_MAX>>2)){+ret=-EINVAL;gotoerr_unlock;+}}if(IS_ERR(btf_vmlinux)){
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:19 PM Hou Tao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
BPF_LOG_KERNEL is only used internally, so disallow bpf_btf_load()
to set log level as BPF_LOG_KERNEL. The same checking has already
been done in bpf_check(), so factor out a helper to check the
validity of log attributes and use it in both places.
Fixes: 8580ac9404f6 ("bpf: Process in-kernel BTF")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <redacted>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <redacted>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -13969,11 +13969,11 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)log->ubuf=(char__user*)(unsignedlong)attr->log_buf;log->len_total=attr->log_size;-ret=-EINVAL;/* log attributes have to be sane */-if(log->len_total<128||log->len_total>UINT_MAX>>2||-!log->level||!log->ubuf||log->level&~BPF_LOG_MASK)+if(!bpf_verifier_log_attr_valid(log,UINT_MAX>>2)){+ret=-EINVAL;
It's actually quite bad that we have this discrepancy in limits.
I've already sent a patch to make them the same.
It was a pain to debug.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124060209.493-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/
"
Otherwise tools that progressively increase log size and use the same log
for BTF loading and program loading will be hitting hard to debug EINVAL.
"
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:19 PM Hou Tao [off-list ref] wrote:
An extra newline will output for bpf_log() with BPF_LOG_KERNEL level
as shown below:
[ 52.095704] BPF:The function test_3 has 12 arguments. Too many.
[ 52.095704]
[ 52.096896] Error in parsing func ptr test_3 in struct bpf_dummy_ops
Now all bpf_log() are ended by newline, but not all btf_verifier_log()
are ended by newline, so checking whether or not the log message
has the trailing newline and adding a newline if not.
Also there is no need to calculate the left userspace buffer size
for kernel log output and to truncate the output by '\0' which
has already been done by vscnprintf(), so only do these for
userspace log output.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <redacted>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <redacted>
Hi,
On 12/2/2021 1:42 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:19 PM Hou Tao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
BPF_LOG_KERNEL is only used internally, so disallow bpf_btf_load()
to set log level as BPF_LOG_KERNEL. The same checking has already
been done in bpf_check(), so factor out a helper to check the
validity of log attributes and use it in both places.
snip
quoted
- ret = -EINVAL; /* log attributes have to be sane */- if (log->len_total < 128 || log->len_total > UINT_MAX >> 2 ||- !log->level || !log->ubuf || log->level & ~BPF_LOG_MASK)+ if (!bpf_verifier_log_attr_valid(log, UINT_MAX >> 2)) {+ ret = -EINVAL;
It's actually quite bad that we have this discrepancy in limits.
I've already sent a patch to make them the same.
It was a pain to debug.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124060209.493-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/
"
Otherwise tools that progressively increase log size and use the same log
for BTF loading and program loading will be hitting hard to debug EINVAL.
"
OK. Will send a single patch to handle that based on your patch set.
Regards,
Tao