[PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: bpf: handle return value of post_bind{4,6} and add selftests for it

STALE1735d

Revision v2 of 4 in this series.

5 messages, 2 authors, 2022-01-05 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: bpf: handle return value of post_bind{4,6} and add selftests for it

From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-30 08:03:31

From: Menglong Dong <redacted>

The return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND() in
__inet_bind() is not handled properly. While the return value
is non-zero, it will set inet_saddr and inet_rcv_saddr to 0 and
exit:
exit:

        err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(sk);
        if (err) {
                inet->inet_saddr = inet->inet_rcv_saddr = 0;
                goto out_release_sock;
        }

Let's take UDP for example and see what will happen. For UDP
socket, it will be added to 'udp_prot.h.udp_table->hash' and
'udp_prot.h.udp_table->hash2' after the sk->sk_prot->get_port()
called success. If 'inet->inet_rcv_saddr' is specified here,
then 'sk' will be in the 'hslot2' of 'hash2' that it don't belong
to (because inet_saddr is changed to 0), and UDP packet received
will not be passed to this sock. If 'inet->inet_rcv_saddr' is not
specified here, the sock will work fine, as it can receive packet
properly, which is wired, as the 'bind()' is already failed.

To undo the get_port() operation, introduce the 'put_port' field
for 'struct proto'. For TCP proto, it is inet_put_port(); For UDP
proto, it is udp_lib_unhash(); For icmp proto, it is
ping_unhash().

Therefore, after sys_bind() fail caused by
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(), it will be unbinded, which
means that it can try to be binded to another port.

The second patch is the selftests for this modification.

Changes since v1:
- introduce 'put_port' field for 'struct proto'
- add selftests for it


Menglong Dong (2):
  net: bpf: handle return value of 
    BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND()
  bpf: selftests: add bind retry for post_bind{4, 6}

 include/net/sock.h                      |   1 +
 net/ipv4/af_inet.c                      |   2 +
 net/ipv4/ping.c                         |   1 +
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c                     |   1 +
 net/ipv4/udp.c                          |   1 +
 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c                     |   2 +
 net/ipv6/ping.c                         |   1 +
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c                     |   1 +
 net/ipv6/udp.c                          |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 10 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: bpf: handle return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND()

From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-30 08:03:38

From: Menglong Dong <redacted>

The return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND() in
__inet_bind() is not handled properly. While the return value
is non-zero, it will set inet_saddr and inet_rcv_saddr to 0 and
exit:

	err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(sk);
	if (err) {
		inet->inet_saddr = inet->inet_rcv_saddr = 0;
		goto out_release_sock;
	}

Let's take UDP for example and see what will happen. For UDP
socket, it will be added to 'udp_prot.h.udp_table->hash' and
'udp_prot.h.udp_table->hash2' after the sk->sk_prot->get_port()
called success. If 'inet->inet_rcv_saddr' is specified here,
then 'sk' will be in the 'hslot2' of 'hash2' that it don't belong
to (because inet_saddr is changed to 0), and UDP packet received
will not be passed to this sock. If 'inet->inet_rcv_saddr' is not
specified here, the sock will work fine, as it can receive packet
properly, which is wired, as the 'bind()' is already failed.

To undo the get_port() operation, introduce the 'put_port' field
for 'struct proto'. For TCP proto, it is inet_put_port(); For UDP
proto, it is udp_lib_unhash(); For icmp proto, it is
ping_unhash().

Therefore, after sys_bind() fail caused by
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(), it will be unbinded, which
means that it can try to be binded to another port.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <redacted>
---
v2:
- introduce 'put_port' field for 'struct proto'
---
 include/net/sock.h  | 1 +
 net/ipv4/af_inet.c  | 2 ++
 net/ipv4/ping.c     | 1 +
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 1 +
 net/ipv4/udp.c      | 1 +
 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 2 ++
 net/ipv6/ping.c     | 1 +
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 1 +
 net/ipv6/udp.c      | 1 +
 9 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 44cc25f0bae7..f5fc0432374e 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1209,6 +1209,7 @@ struct proto {
 	void			(*unhash)(struct sock *sk);
 	void			(*rehash)(struct sock *sk);
 	int			(*get_port)(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum);
+	void			(*put_port)(struct sock *sk);
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 	int			(*psock_update_sk_prot)(struct sock *sk,
 							struct sk_psock *psock,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 5d18d32557d2..8784e72d4b8b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ int __inet_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len,
 			err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(sk);
 			if (err) {
 				inet->inet_saddr = inet->inet_rcv_saddr = 0;
+				if (sk->sk_prot->get_port)
+					sk->sk_prot->put_port(sk);
 				goto out_release_sock;
 			}
 		}
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ping.c b/net/ipv4/ping.c
index e540b0dcf085..0e56df3a45e2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ping.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ping.c
@@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ struct proto ping_prot = {
 	.hash =		ping_hash,
 	.unhash =	ping_unhash,
 	.get_port =	ping_get_port,
+	.put_port =	ping_unhash,
 	.obj_size =	sizeof(struct inet_sock),
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ping_prot);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 03dc4c79b84b..0ffb5b5779c0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -3082,6 +3082,7 @@ struct proto tcp_prot = {
 	.hash			= inet_hash,
 	.unhash			= inet_unhash,
 	.get_port		= inet_csk_get_port,
+	.put_port		= inet_put_port,
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 	.psock_update_sk_prot	= tcp_bpf_update_proto,
 #endif
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index f376c777e8fc..c87e3888c8f8 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -2926,6 +2926,7 @@ struct proto udp_prot = {
 	.unhash			= udp_lib_unhash,
 	.rehash			= udp_v4_rehash,
 	.get_port		= udp_v4_get_port,
+	.put_port		= udp_lib_unhash,
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 	.psock_update_sk_prot	= udp_bpf_update_proto,
 #endif
diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
index d1636425654e..ddfc6821e682 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
@@ -413,6 +413,8 @@ static int __inet6_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len,
 			if (err) {
 				sk->sk_ipv6only = saved_ipv6only;
 				inet_reset_saddr(sk);
+				if (sk->sk_prot->get_port)
+					sk->sk_prot->put_port(sk);
 				goto out;
 			}
 		}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ping.c b/net/ipv6/ping.c
index 6ac88fe24a8e..9256f6ba87ef 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ping.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ping.c
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct proto pingv6_prot = {
 	.hash =		ping_hash,
 	.unhash =	ping_unhash,
 	.get_port =	ping_get_port,
+	.put_port =	ping_unhash,
 	.obj_size =	sizeof(struct raw6_sock),
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pingv6_prot);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 1ac243d18c2b..075ee8a2df3b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -2181,6 +2181,7 @@ struct proto tcpv6_prot = {
 	.hash			= inet6_hash,
 	.unhash			= inet_unhash,
 	.get_port		= inet_csk_get_port,
+	.put_port		= inet_put_port,
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 	.psock_update_sk_prot	= tcp_bpf_update_proto,
 #endif
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index 01e53eb4875a..cd402bdf9eed 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -1731,6 +1731,7 @@ struct proto udpv6_prot = {
 	.unhash			= udp_lib_unhash,
 	.rehash			= udp_v6_rehash,
 	.get_port		= udp_v6_get_port,
+	.put_port		= udp_lib_unhash,
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 	.psock_update_sk_prot	= udp_bpf_update_proto,
 #endif
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH net-next 2/2] bpf: selftests: add bind retry for post_bind{4, 6}

From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-30 08:03:44

From: Menglong Dong <redacted>

With previous patch, kernel is able to 'put_port' after sys_bind()
fails. Add the test for that case: rebind another port after
sys_bind() fails. If the bind success, it means previous bind
operation is already undoed.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <redacted>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index e8edd3dd3ec2..68525d68d4e5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -35,12 +35,15 @@ struct sock_test {
 	/* Endpoint to bind() to */
 	const char *ip;
 	unsigned short port;
+	unsigned short port_retry;
 	/* Expected test result */
 	enum {
 		LOAD_REJECT,
 		ATTACH_REJECT,
 		BIND_REJECT,
 		SUCCESS,
+		RETRY_SUCCESS,
+		RETRY_REJECT
 	} result;
 };
 
@@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		LOAD_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -77,6 +81,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		LOAD_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -94,6 +99,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		LOAD_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -111,6 +117,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		LOAD_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -125,6 +132,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"127.0.0.1",
 		8097,
+		0,
 		SUCCESS,
 	},
 	{
@@ -139,6 +147,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"127.0.0.1",
 		8097,
+		0,
 		SUCCESS,
 	},
 	{
@@ -153,6 +162,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		ATTACH_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -167,6 +177,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		ATTACH_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -181,6 +192,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		ATTACH_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -195,6 +207,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		0,
 		NULL,
 		0,
+		0,
 		ATTACH_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -209,6 +222,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"0.0.0.0",
 		0,
+		0,
 		BIND_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -223,6 +237,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"::",
 		0,
+		0,
 		BIND_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -253,6 +268,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"::1",
 		8193,
+		0,
 		BIND_REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -283,8 +299,102 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"127.0.0.1",
 		4098,
+		0,
 		SUCCESS,
 	},
+	{
+		"bind4 deny specific IP & port of TCP, and retry",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+
+			/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+				    __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x7F000001), 4),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x1002, 2),
+
+			/* return DENY; */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_A(1),
+
+			/* else return ALLOW; */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+		BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+		AF_INET,
+		SOCK_STREAM,
+		"127.0.0.1",
+		4098,
+		5000,
+		RETRY_SUCCESS,
+	},
+	{
+		"bind4 deny specific IP & port of UDP, and retry",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+
+			/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+				    __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x7F000001), 4),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x1002, 2),
+
+			/* return DENY; */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_A(1),
+
+			/* else return ALLOW; */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+		BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+		AF_INET,
+		SOCK_DGRAM,
+		"127.0.0.1",
+		4098,
+		5000,
+		RETRY_SUCCESS,
+	},
+	{
+		"bind6 deny specific IP & port, and retry",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+
+			/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip6[3])),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+				    __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x00000001), 4),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x2001, 2),
+
+			/* return DENY; */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_A(1),
+
+			/* else return ALLOW; */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND,
+		BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND,
+		AF_INET6,
+		SOCK_STREAM,
+		"::1",
+		8193,
+		9000,
+		RETRY_SUCCESS,
+	},
 	{
 		"bind4 allow all",
 		.insns = {
@@ -297,6 +407,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"0.0.0.0",
 		0,
+		0,
 		SUCCESS,
 	},
 	{
@@ -311,6 +422,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 		SOCK_STREAM,
 		"::",
 		0,
+		0,
 		SUCCESS,
 	},
 };
@@ -351,14 +463,15 @@ static int attach_sock_prog(int cgfd, int progfd,
 	return bpf_prog_attach(progfd, cgfd, attach_type, BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE);
 }
 
-static int bind_sock(int domain, int type, const char *ip, unsigned short port)
+static int bind_sock(int domain, int type, const char *ip,
+		     unsigned short port, unsigned short port_retry)
 {
 	struct sockaddr_storage addr;
 	struct sockaddr_in6 *addr6;
 	struct sockaddr_in *addr4;
 	int sockfd = -1;
 	socklen_t len;
-	int err = 0;
+	int res = SUCCESS;
 
 	sockfd = socket(domain, type, 0);
 	if (sockfd < 0)
@@ -384,21 +497,44 @@ static int bind_sock(int domain, int type, const char *ip, unsigned short port)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	if (bind(sockfd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, len) == -1)
-		goto err;
+	if (bind(sockfd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, len) == -1) {
+		/* sys_bind() may fail for different reasons, errno has to be
+		 * checked to confirm that BPF program rejected it.
+		 */
+		if (errno != EPERM)
+			goto err;
+		if (port_retry)
+			goto retry;
+		res = BIND_REJECT;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
+	goto out;
+retry:
+	if (domain == AF_INET)
+		addr4->sin_port = htons(port_retry);
+	else
+		addr6->sin6_port = htons(port_retry);
+	if (bind(sockfd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, len) == -1) {
+		if (errno != EPERM)
+			goto err;
+		res = RETRY_REJECT;
+	} else {
+		res = RETRY_SUCCESS;
+	}
 	goto out;
 err:
-	err = -1;
+	res = -1;
 out:
 	close(sockfd);
-	return err;
+	return res;
 }
 
 static int run_test_case(int cgfd, const struct sock_test *test)
 {
 	int progfd = -1;
 	int err = 0;
+	int res;
 
 	printf("Test case: %s .. ", test->descr);
 	progfd = load_sock_prog(test->insns, test->expected_attach_type);
@@ -416,21 +552,11 @@ static int run_test_case(int cgfd, const struct sock_test *test)
 			goto err;
 	}
 
-	if (bind_sock(test->domain, test->type, test->ip, test->port) == -1) {
-		/* sys_bind() may fail for different reasons, errno has to be
-		 * checked to confirm that BPF program rejected it.
-		 */
-		if (test->result == BIND_REJECT && errno == EPERM)
-			goto out;
-		else
-			goto err;
-	}
-
+	res = bind_sock(test->domain, test->type, test->ip, test->port,
+			test->port_retry);
+	if (res > 0 && test->result == res)
+		goto out;
 
-	if (test->result != SUCCESS)
-		goto err;
-
-	goto out;
 err:
 	err = -1;
 out:
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: bpf: handle return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND()

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2022-01-05 13:01:59

On 12/30/21 9:03 AM, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
quoted hunk
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 44cc25f0bae7..f5fc0432374e 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1209,6 +1209,7 @@ struct proto {
  	void			(*unhash)(struct sock *sk);
  	void			(*rehash)(struct sock *sk);
  	int			(*get_port)(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum);
+	void			(*put_port)(struct sock *sk);
  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
  	int			(*psock_update_sk_prot)(struct sock *sk,
  							struct sk_psock *psock,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 5d18d32557d2..8784e72d4b8b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ int __inet_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len,
  			err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(sk);
  			if (err) {
  				inet->inet_saddr = inet->inet_rcv_saddr = 0;
+				if (sk->sk_prot->get_port)
+					sk->sk_prot->put_port(sk);
  				goto out_release_sock;
  			}
  		}
[...]
quoted hunk
diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
index d1636425654e..ddfc6821e682 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
@@ -413,6 +413,8 @@ static int __inet6_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len,
  			if (err) {
  				sk->sk_ipv6only = saved_ipv6only;
  				inet_reset_saddr(sk);
+				if (sk->sk_prot->get_port)
+					sk->sk_prot->put_port(sk);
  				goto out;
  			}
  		}
I presume both tests above should test for non-zero sk->sk_prot->put_port
callback given that is what they end up calling when true, no?

Thanks,
Daniel

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: bpf: handle return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND()

From: Menglong Dong <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-05 13:07:07

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:01 PM Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On 12/30/21 9:03 AM, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 44cc25f0bae7..f5fc0432374e 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1209,6 +1209,7 @@ struct proto {
      void                    (*unhash)(struct sock *sk);
      void                    (*rehash)(struct sock *sk);
      int                     (*get_port)(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum);
+     void                    (*put_port)(struct sock *sk);
  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
      int                     (*psock_update_sk_prot)(struct sock *sk,
                                                      struct sk_psock *psock,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 5d18d32557d2..8784e72d4b8b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ int __inet_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len,
                      err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(sk);
                      if (err) {
                              inet->inet_saddr = inet->inet_rcv_saddr = 0;
+                             if (sk->sk_prot->get_port)
+                                     sk->sk_prot->put_port(sk);
                              goto out_release_sock;
                      }
              }
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
index d1636425654e..ddfc6821e682 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
@@ -413,6 +413,8 @@ static int __inet6_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len,
                      if (err) {
                              sk->sk_ipv6only = saved_ipv6only;
                              inet_reset_saddr(sk);
+                             if (sk->sk_prot->get_port)
+                                     sk->sk_prot->put_port(sk);
                              goto out;
                      }
              }
I presume both tests above should test for non-zero sk->sk_prot->put_port
callback given that is what they end up calling when true, no?
You are right, I think that I made a big mistake here...:/

Thanks!
Menglong Dong
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help